3927 Khz Saturday NET
Hi Everyone.
Was on frequency at 0755 California time only to find a foreign broadcast at 30 over S9, ugh.
0800 they dropped off the air, YES!
Clint KA7OEI long time LOWFER ('C' Beacon) joined us. Nice to have you with us Clint. Clint has some really good info on his website http://ka7oei.com/.
Look forward to having you join us again Clint, thanks.
Sent out a QRZ and Robert KBZQXM stepped up with a really good signal even though he had to use his tuner to convince his transmitter to get the RF to his antenna.
Well, we are growing and hopefully all of you who can will join the round table next Saturday at 0800 California time on 3927 Khz.
At my QTH with 40 acres to work with I am considering putting down a couple of BOB's (beverage on the ground antennas) to augment my active whips. I contemplate the first one to be oriented somewhat N/S so I will be looking at Dave Curry's signal for comparisons from this Creston QTH.
Any ideas please chime in.
73's for now,,,hopefully see you next Saturday at 0800 California time on 3927 Khz,
JERRY 'OWR'
BOG Antenna help
Posted by Jerry Parker on October 03, 2017 at 18:03:41.
40 acres to play with.
Looking for any experience with Beverage on the Ground antennas or info.
Thanks,
JERRY 'OWR'
Re: BOG Antenna help
Posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 03, 2017 at 22:25:32.
In reply to BOG Antenna help posted by Jerry Parker on October 03, 2017
Jerry, lots of info on BOG antennas on the web. Re: BOG Antenna help
Just search for 'bog antenna'.
GL...73 de Bill K4JYS
Posted by Mike N8OOU on October 04, 2017 at 00:54:11.
In reply to BOG Antenna help posted by Jerry Parker on October 03, 2017
Jerry, I tried one for a while. It was about 800 Ft long 3 Ft above ground. My Deer population made it a high maintenance item. I was happier with a PA0RDT mini whip. The critters haven't knocked it down yet!
Google Bob Sutton, ZL1RS for pics and info of a successful installation.
Mike 73
BEACON MLS
Posted by Mark on October 04, 2017 at 17:23:38.
Hi all ! Re: 630 meters/477.7
I plan on activating BEACON MLS on 186.204 KHz soon. As before it will be using QRSS30 mode. I'm waiting on the first cold frosty day. I'll keep you posted.
Also, I submitted my info for operation on the new 630 meter Band on Sept 23. My antenna is a 30 foot vertical with a large coil and cap hat rods at the top and a tuning box from an old military BC375 at the bottom. I then ran 60 ground radials and the antenna tuned with a SWR of 1.3 to 1. My transmitter is CW only, crystal controlled on 473.100 KHz running about 50 Watts output for now. I will adjust output to maintain the 5 Watt ERP level after I do measurements. I guess the magic day for me will be Oct 23 which will be the end of the 30 day wait period. On Oct 23 at 7:00 PM EST I will be sending short test transmissions to my Ham buddies who range from 4 to 30 miles distance. They will help evaluate my signal for strength and purity. Oh yes, my Ham call is AC8CL. If you receive my signals, please post a message. I also have a R390 receiver set up with a converter for reception. Thanks.... Mark AC8CL
Posted by Joe VO1NA on October 04, 2017 at 23:24:26.
In reply to Re: 630 meters/477.7 posted by joe vo1na on September 27, 2017
The beacon is now QRSS10 to improve the odds for reception. WM Lowfer on air
73
Joe VO1NA
Posted by Mike N8OOU on October 05, 2017 at 01:51:48.
ALL;
I have re-started the WM Lowfer beacon on 185300.5 Hz. It is currently sending the WM graphic followed by FSKCW at QRSS30 speed. Several changes to the antenna system have been incorporated in the beacon.
I too have submitted my info to the UTC the evening of Sept 15th. I plan to put a machine on the air in a couple weeks transmitting WSPR into an Ashlock Loop.
73 Mike N8OOU
Re: 630 meters/477.7
Posted by Garry, K3SIW on October 05, 2017 at 11:57:14.
In reply to Re: 630 meters/477.7 posted by Joe VO1NA on October 04, 2017
Joe, thanks for running your beacon. QRSS10 helped, but at times your signal was visible at QRSS3 rate too. Up and down copy throughout the night here with best signals around 0600Z.
73, Garry, K3SIW, EN52ta, Elgin, IL, 2849 km
Re: WM Lowfer on air
Posted by Chuck, N1KGY on October 05, 2017 at 20:03:56.
In reply to WM Lowfer on air posted by Mike N8OOU on October 05, 2017
I have several questions, Mike -
Which band are you going to run the Ashlock Loop on, and what are the perimeter and materials you used to construct it?
Also, what does your final look like? Are you using a ckt. similar to the bipolar Lowfer finals published by Kohler (and similar by several others), or are you using FETs in a Class-D/Class-E arrangement with a closer resemblance to the designs published in the last 10 years for use on HF?
Thanks 13.56 mhz Xtals on eBay
Chuck
Posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 05, 2017 at 23:14:54.
Being new here, I am unaware if this info has been passed along. Here is a link to a eBay seller that has a few hifer xtals at:
shttp://www.ebay.com/itm/13-56-MHZ-HIFER-BAND-QRP-CONVERSION-IN-FT-243-HOLDER-/222640715773?hash=item33d66bb7fd:g:icMAAOSwKOJYJg7d
No connection to seller...73 de Bill K4JYS
Loaded Bases tonight
Posted by Bill Hensel on October 06, 2017 at 01:01:42.
Caught Three Hifers tonight...this hasn't happened in a good while.
GNK Q5 0035 utc
K6FRC Q4 0042 utc
AZ Q3 0047 utc
It took a little while to catch AZ, I kept dialing back on the Freq. and could hear some type of ID but could not make it out, then finally AZ started fading up and I would catch 3-4 ids in a row then it would fade down then it would come back up for 3-5 ids...
Good to hear GNK skipping into Colorado and of course AZ was a special treat. Re: WM Lowfer on air
Hope other start listening for the Hifers a little more often
Posted by Mike N8OOU on October 06, 2017 at 04:47:39.
In reply to Re: WM Lowfer on air posted by Chuck, N1KGY on October 05, 2017
Chuck;
I plan to follow the basic guidelines that were published by Bill Ashlock some time ago. He did a lot of work and experimentation on the designs with his WA/WM LowFer beacons. I replicated that loop antenna system here and conducted a few short tests on 1750m. I however am skeptical about the legality of it under the part 15 rules and use the typical flattop vertical.
As I understand the part 97 rules, that type of antenna won't be an issue. The U3S will operate as the exciter on both 2200m and 630m. It has the capability to band switch the PA and loop tuning capacitors as necessary.
The loop I have tested with was constructed with 200 Ft. of Quad Shield RG-6 coax using just the outside braid-shield. I am continuing my hamfest search of longer and larger diameter coax or wire to use in place of the RG-6.
The PA used in the Ashlock design is a slightly modified Kohler bipolar push-pull. I have tested with the PA he built and used on his beacon. I have also built and tested class D and E MOSFET PA's. I need to decide which one will end up in the transmitter box. With the "small" transmitting loop and low power PA, I will be a QRP station.
You can find more information about my current WM beacons and a little history of the Ashlock beacons at wmbeacon.meekfarm.us. Re: 630 meters/477.7
Posted by Joe VO1NA on October 06, 2017 at 11:02:02.
In reply to Re: 630 meters/477.7 posted by Garry, K3SIW on October 05, 2017
Hi Gary,
It's good to get another report from this side of the pond. The QSB is interesting and seems to be a defining feature of this band.
Thank-you for the info. The beacon will be running again tonight.
73 Reminder. LOWFER NET Saturday 0800 pdt on 3927 Khz
Joe VO1NA
Posted by Jerry Parker on October 06, 2017 at 14:41:21.
Reminder. LOWFER NET Saturday 0800 pdt on 3927 Khz
Please join us.
Re: 13.56 mhz Xtals on eBay
Jerry 'OWR'
Posted by ed holland on October 06, 2017 at 23:40:49.
In reply to 13.56 mhz Xtals on eBay posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 05, 2017
Thanks Bill,
Reading carefully, these are HC49US (small form) crystals in larger packages. As such, the actual active element is available from many places.
I understand that the truly larger package crystals actually have a larger quartz element, and can be more amenable to "pulling" the frequency.
for example
www.ebay.com/itm/13-560MHz-Crystal-HC-49-u-New-wire-lead-for-CB-Radio-/131857754685
Of course, if you want the FT243 holder, your link is just the ticket :-)
Best regards and 73s
Re: 13.56 mhz Xtals on eBay
Posted by John, W1TAG on October 07, 2017 at 00:09:09.
In reply to Re: 13.56 mhz Xtals on eBay posted by ed holland on October 06, 2017
I'll give the old disclaimer here that 13,560 is a real RF sewer, due to all of the industrial and medical gear right on that frequency. Your goal should be to get at least 2 kHz away on either side.
John, W1TAG
Re: 13.56 mhz Xtals on eBay
Posted by John Davis on October 07, 2017 at 00:38:54.
In reply to Re: 13.56 mhz Xtals on eBay posted by ed holland on October 06, 2017
As such, the actual active element is available from many places.
And frequently at considerably lower prices!
This mornings net
Posted by Jerry Parker on October 07, 2017 at 16:55:30.
Hi Everyone.
nice turn out on the LowFER NET this morning on 3927 Khz at 0800 California time.
The Japanese broadcast station shut down right at 0800 so we were in the clear with some QSB.
Fun NET this morning with:
Dave Curry WD4PLI (Beacon WH2XVN 183.5 kHZ) from Burbank, CA,
Ed Larsen KI6R (Beacon 6R 186.7kHZ) from Eldorado Hills, CA,
Clint Turner KA7OEI from Utah
W6IZJ Frank Philips in San Gabriel listening
WA6OWR in Creston, CA.
Discussion on what everyone is doing.
Ed and Dave discussed loops they are or will be working on.
I am working on installing a BOG in the ravine next to the shack pointed at Dave Curry's QTH and moving the active whip up on the mesa behind the house to reduce the noise. Receivers are Yaesu FT 747 and new Icom 7300
Ed Larsen mentioned he had the NX beacon on in Morro Bay in the '80es and Clint had the CT beacon in the 80'es too. His Beacon '6R' is on 185.700 Khz 24/7 excluding power failures
Dave talked about several folks back then meeting on SSB in the lowfer band on Saturdays and he is hopeful we can do this on 630 meters in the future. It will be interesting to see the transverter and tranceiver market with the new bands also. Dave has his Part 5 beacon on 186.5 Khz and looks for QSOs on Saturdays.
I believe my Icom 7300 will transmit on the new bands now with the mars mod.
Exciting times with the new low bands, 2200m and 630Khz coming up.
Looking forward to next Saturdays net at 0800 PDT ON 3927kHZ
Please join us if you can,
73's
Jerry Parker Re: 13.56 mhz Xtals on eBay
WA6OWR
Posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 07, 2017 at 22:14:28.
In reply to Re: 13.56 mhz Xtals on eBay posted by John, W1TAG on October 07, 2017
You are right, John...listened a bit on 22m this PM and 13.56mhz wrapped up with some type of noisy digital, I guess it is. A few days ago I heard two foreign language ssb stns around 13.55. So far haven't had much luck with hifer beacons there other than PLM and a few years ago heard GNK. But will keep on listening. Re: 13.56 mhz Xtals on eBay
Bill K4JYS
Posted by Ed Holland on October 07, 2017 at 23:05:40.
In reply to Re: 13.56 mhz Xtals on eBay posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 07, 2017
Don't give up Bill,
The HiFER game is rewarded with patience and fortune. Sometimes I've heard voice transmissions in Spanish right in the ISM allocation. Apparently these are fishermen from South of the border.
I walked our neighborhood, trying to see what my beacon's signal was doing. We're semi-rural, and yet in various places, different blips and beeps were audible every few hundred yards.
PVC was set at 13,558.4 MHz, because that was the best spot I could tune with the crystal I bought. It is used in a repurposed Vectronics 20m QRP transmitter.
The important part is to remember to have fun, keep listening, and experiment once in a while.
Cheers and 73s,
Ed
Re: This mornings net
Posted by Jerry Parker on October 08, 2017 at 01:43:50.
In reply to This mornings net posted by Jerry Parker on October 07, 2017
NOTE: Dave Curry's Beacon is on 183.5 Khz. (not 186.5).
AZ Heard
Posted by Ed Holland on October 08, 2017 at 03:58:35.
Limited listening today, but around 16:25 PST (23:25 UTC) I received several clear instances of beacon AZ. This is after a long absence of this old friend from my log book.
More monitoring tomorrow,
Ed
How To Get Started With a HIFER
Posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 08, 2017 at 16:33:53.
Tnx Ed for the encouragement. I realize that the Hifer beacons are at the whim
of propagation (which has been dismal of late) and of course the low power
involved. My amateur radio activities were a bit subdued during the summer
due mostly to the poor band condx....same goes for the beacon chasing.
I hesitate to ask the following questions since this subject has probably been
discussed many times on this list....however, here goes anyway and I apologize
for the length:
Should one want to put on a Hifer beacon (not saying I'm gonna but...) I was
wondering just how to go about it. I would be interested in the CW mode...no
digital. I have read the FCC regs and pretty well understand the main points.
As for a transmitter, I guess there are numerous ways to go....homebrew from scratch, modify an existing QRP rig as you did, buy something ready to go
(haven't seen any of those). From my standpoint, I am not much on solid state,
which I would guess would be the best way to go. I do prefer tubes and do some building of one tube osc. rigs. I have seen mention of some type of IC that has a
QRP xmtr built in with inputs for voltages and keying. I think they can be programed by the vendor when bought. I guess about the only thing to add would be a keyer
and antenna coupling....any comments on any of these methods.
I see that the FCC spec holds the FS to 15,848 microvols at 30 mtrs for freqs of
13.553 to 13.567 mhz. I suppose this is where all Hifers operate since the most
power is allowed in this part of the band. Is there a practical way to measure for
this FS? How does this equate to xmtr input/output?
Is there any coordination of beacon freqs or just fire up where ya want to
or depending on what xtal one might have available?
I will stop with this: how complex were the mods you did to the QRP xmtr?
Thanks for putting up with this. I appreciate any comments.
Thanks/73 de Bill K4JYS
UTC Rejection
Posted by Frank Lotito on October 08, 2017 at 17:29:32.
I'm curious - Has anyone received a rejection from the UTC regarding their intended operation on the new 2200 and 630 meter bands? Hope not -
73 Frank K3DZ / WH2XHA Re: How To Get Started With a HIFER
Posted by Ed Holland on October 08, 2017 at 20:58:21.
In reply to How To Get Started With a HIFER posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 08, 2017
Good Questions Bill.
My setup was simple enough really. Mods to the QRP rig included
1) Adding the 13.56 crystal the second crystal position.
2) Calculating and building an attenuator to take the nominal 1.25 W down to <4 mW.
This is a bit wasteful I suppose, but was the easiest way to get going. The system is keyed using a kit from K1EL. It is fairly easy to program with any Morse message - you can keep several stored in memories.
Antenna is a sloping Dipole on the house roof. Cabling is all 75 ohm TV stuff, with attempts to match appropriately using a balun at the antenna feed and an ATU after the transmitter.
I'm not a licenced amateur - I'm a radio listener, tinkerer and experimenter. The HiFER operation stuff is a real gift.
A little tube osc. rig would be neat - you could use a dual triode or similar to buffer, key and cut down the drive to an allowable O/P level.
Ed
Re: UTC Rejection
Posted by Chuck, N1KGY on October 08, 2017 at 21:00:44.
In reply to UTC Rejection posted by Frank Lotito on October 08, 2017
Frank and all,
I never received confirmation of receipt for my submissions (three, in all), nor anything since. I suspect there's not much of a 'system' behind that webpage at all, at least not so far. Maybe when they actually get around to processing all those submissions, they'll find/use a loophole in the regulations to deny those which they find problematic...
Only time will tell.
For me, ten more days and I can go on the air. I might even be ready at that point.
I decided against using a down-converter with a dedicated HF rig and PC to modulate it; so I'm building everything from scratch - and running into the usual gremlins encountered when undertaking a complex project of this nature. I seem to have an incurable infatuation with difficulty ;P
73 all,
Chuck
Re: This mornings net
Posted by jimvm on October 09, 2017 at 17:25:42.
In reply to Re: This mornings net posted by Jerry Parker on October 08, 2017
I was able to copy Dave's beacon on 183.5 kHz late Saturday morning.
DX is 382.1 miles from my QTH in Olivehurst, CA.
It took me a while to decode but the end of ID was 'AR long dash'.
Will try again and hope to get full ID.
Using Pixel pro-1B loop antenna and a Flex 6300 rcvr.
jim vm wb6qzl
Back in the day Hifer HI
Posted by Bill Hensel on October 10, 2017 at 02:38:38.
I remember hearing HI often many years ago. Was it a true Hifer in the sense that it ran the ~ 4 mw watts? Someone told me it was a little tube transmitter. Re: UTC Rejection
Anyone out there remember HI?
Posted by Bob Magill on October 10, 2017 at 13:45:50.
In reply to Re: UTC Rejection posted by Chuck, N1KGY on October 08, 2017
Hello Chuck and all ----
Well, I sent my two requests in to UTC, one for each band, two days ago. Mine should be an interesting test since I am located about 1/2 mile from major power lines and about a mile from a substation. Hard to say what criteria UTC will use to "test" our locations. Wondering if it will be location-sensitive and/or frequency-sensitive?? Hard to say but hope all goes well as would like to set up for some new band action (HI).
Located just east of the SF Bay Area. Now it is a waiting game.
Cheers All, 73s Re: Back in the day Hifer HI
Bob - K6WL - San Ramon, CA USA CM97as.
Posted by John, W1TAG on October 10, 2017 at 15:35:13.
In reply to Back in the day Hifer HI posted by Bill Hensel on October 10, 2017
Bill,
I do remember him. You are correct that it was a tube rig -very home brew. He sent me a hand-drawn schematic in response to a reception report. The final stage may have been a 6AQ5, obviously good for more than a few mw! I'll look for the drawing later this week. He used a mechanical keyer, motor driven.
I believe that Sal, K1RGO, visited him once.
John, W1TAG
Re: Back in the day Hifer HI
Posted by Bill Hensel on October 10, 2017 at 16:25:29.
In reply to Re: Back in the day Hifer HI posted by John, W1TAG on October 10, 2017
Thanks John, to bad a photo is not available...
Re: UTC Rejection
Posted by John Davis on October 10, 2017 at 19:28:05.
In reply to Re: UTC Rejection posted by Bob Magill on October 10, 2017
>>> Wondering if it will be location-sensitive and/or frequency-sensitive??
Those are exactly the criteria. If you're within 1 km of any point on a line that's using a PLC in either band, your submission for that band will be rejected.
Re: How To Get Started With a HIFER
Posted by John Davis on October 10, 2017 at 19:36:42.
In reply to How To Get Started With a HIFER posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 08, 2017
The power-to-field-strength question is covered in this post: Re: UTC Rejection
lwca.org/mb/msg/6733.htm
Posted by Mark on October 11, 2017 at 16:42:42.
In reply to Re: UTC Rejection posted by John Davis on October 10, 2017
Hi all, new LOWFER Beacon ON THE AIR ....
I'm 18 days into the wait period. So far no rejection notice. No news is good news I guess. My startup station will be a simple setup. I'll be using CW mode on 473.1 KHz and I still plan to start sending test messages to local Hams on Oct.23 starting around 7:00 PM EST. Of course a receiver will also on line for possible contacts. If anyone receives my signal, please post a message. I've been a Ham for 42 years but now I feel like a young eager Novice again. This is going to be alot of fun! *** Mark AC8CL
Posted by Gary Babcock on October 12, 2017 at 02:33:16.
I have a New LOWFER beacon on the air at 187.5 KC running 800mw to a Vertical GP antenna. Slow CW (5wpm) sending GNB GNB GNB DM73 DM73 in a loop.
Send reception reports to GARYBABCOCK69@YAHOO.COM
Best Regards to all Re: How To Get Started With a HIFER
Gary - W5GNB
~~
Posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 12, 2017 at 19:59:15.
In reply to Re: How To Get Started With a HIFER posted by John Davis on October 10, 2017
Tnx, John, for he info...Bill
Re: UTC Rejection
Posted by Mike N8OOU on October 12, 2017 at 21:13:46.
In reply to UTC Rejection posted by Frank Lotito on October 08, 2017
Frank and All,
Three more days to go, and I have not yet received a rejection yet.
However, I noticed a USIC utility locating service truck stop in the road, in front of my house a few minutes ago. I could see the driver typing onto a laptop computer in the passenger seat. When he finished, he drove on down the road.
That is an unusual event here as I am located in pure farm land 5 miles from anything. There is only the routine farm harvest going on around here. Could the UTC possibly be using the utility locating services to validate the information we submitted online???
Mike N8OOU
UTC Apprival
Posted by Chris Waldrup on October 13, 2017 at 19:10:09.
Just got my approval email from the UTC.
Has anyone else gotten one?
Chris Re: UTC Apprival
KD4PBJ
Posted by Mike N8OOU on October 13, 2017 at 20:54:00.
In reply to UTC Apprival posted by Chris Waldrup on October 13, 2017
Chris and All,
I also received the UTC approval email today. It is nice that the UTC sent out the positive acknowledgment. I don't remember reading in the rules that a positive would be sent.
Now, on to get the antenna up and start vibrating the either.
Mike N8OOU
Re: UTC Apprival
Posted by Chris Waldrup on October 13, 2017 at 22:37:08.
In reply to Re: UTC Apprival posted by Mike N8OOU on October 13, 2017
It sure is nice!
I meant approval not whatever I typed in the subject. Sorry for the fat finger typo. This is what I get by doing it through my phone I guess.
Chris
Western 3937Khz NET 0800 pdt Saturday
Posted by Jerry Parker on October 13, 2017 at 23:02:55.
Please join us at 0800 pdt Saturday morning on 3927 Khz.
Look forward to hearing you there
73,
Jerry Parker LOWFER NET Saturday 0800 a.m. pdtW
WA6OWR
Posted by Jerry Parker on October 13, 2017 at 23:09:16.
3927 Khz not 3937 Khz
Thanks
WH2XND Transmitting on 138.000 KHz
Posted by Ron Douglass NI7J-WH2XND on October 15, 2017 at 00:40:20.
Gentlemen, I have left the new 2200 Meter Amateur band and will continue use of my Experimental Part 5 grant on 138.000 KHz. The proper frequency settings for WSPR are as follows as recommended by John W1TAG. WSPR transmissions will be on 138.000, and your receivers need to be retuned to 136.500 USB.
Also, John strongly suggests that WSJT-X users create another band entry for 136.500. That way, the reported XND frequency to the WSPR database will be correct.
If you leave WSJT-X set up for the stock 136 kHz, and tune their receivers to 136.500, you will be reported as being on 137.500, and other receiving ops may try to look for you there! Re: WH2XND Transmitting on 138.000 KHz
It'll only take one guy with the standard 136.000 kHz setup to create this confusion.
Thanks John for the update!
Posted by Mike on October 15, 2017 at 01:10:26.
In reply to WH2XND Transmitting on 138.000 KHz posted by Ron Douglass NI7J-WH2XND on October 15, 2017
I found the advanced mouse settings (F5) which let me enter the .136500 frequency in the band window... 630 Mtr Stn Heard
Posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 15, 2017 at 18:09:30.
I heard K4LY calling CQ around 474.2khz this morning around 0035Z. Re: Back in the day Hifer HI
His CW sigs were 569 here in NC. He is in SC.
Rcvr:
Ten-Tec RX-340
Antenna: 80/40 meter dipole
Broad side N/S
73 de Bill K4JYS
Smithfield, NC
30 miles SE of Raleigh, NC
Posted by Sal, K1RGO on October 15, 2017 at 18:10:19.
In reply to Back in the day Hifer HI posted by Bill Hensel on October 10, 2017
I did visit Ronnie Graham "HI" many years ago when hiking in the area, it was like a trip back in time. Re: 630 Mtr Stn Heard
He lived in a little 3 room house heated with a wood stove an old frige, an old wooden stand up radio, old stove (propane , I guess)etc... I don't recall what tube was in the final but it probably ran a couple of watts. he had a mechanical keyer on both his hifer and medfer and lowfer rigs. His lowfer rig had a 6L6 in the PA and ran 20 watts into a long wire, how long I don't know I asked him a few times with no response, (he is hard of hearing). One version of his medfer had 2 xtals with a 6BE6 mixer driving , I think, a 6C4 maybe running a watt or 2.
later
Sal, K1RGO
Posted by Joe VO1NA on October 15, 2017 at 20:09:41.
In reply to 630 Mtr Stn Heard posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 15, 2017
I plan to QRV tonight 2300 utc calling CQ on 477.7 kHz and listening for calls on 477.7 kHz. Hope to fill many log sheets!
73 Weekend Hifers
Joe
Posted by ed holland on October 16, 2017 at 16:18:50.
Hi Folks,
Hifer Conditions are showing promise. This weekend, with listening sessions around 4pm (PST +DST) or 00:00Z I was able to catch AZ, and also USC, NC and another FSK signal at the watering hole whom I could not identify, near 13,555.10 MHz (if I recall correctly). This was the best weekend of the season so far. Listening needs a little more time spent to do things justice.
Reception was with the NRD 535 and random dipole as usual, though I have been trying a variety of receivers from the collection, to inject a bit of fun.
73's,
Ed
utc approval
Posted by Sal, K1RGO on October 18, 2017 at 15:48:19.
I was surprised when I received an email from the UTC approving my 630 meter operation. Mystery Utility Truck
yesterday, so I called a CQ on 474kHz that night with no luck. I thought someone was calling me but the QRN was s9. I heard NO3M I think,(QRN) in QSO with a w9. There was some digital modes going on above 475 kHz also.
I assume I am running about 1 watt ERP for now. I will evaluate ground losses etc.. as the winter season gets started.
later...
Sal,K1RGO
Posted by Lee on October 19, 2017 at 00:23:26.
Well 25 days into my request for 600 and 2200 meter band usage I had a visitor. One of those Communication contractor trucks pulled up in front of my property. Stayed there for about 10 min and then left. Very Interesting. I read about other similar incidents here so thought I should mention it. Lee KE6PCT
WISPER MODE
Posted by Mark V on October 20, 2017 at 00:57:43.
Listening USB on 474.2 were the WSPR should be at and I'm not able to decode anything, even though the signal strength is S7. Does anyone know if this is standard WSPR mode, or something different? wisper mode
Thanks,
Mark V.
Posted by John Bruce McCreath on October 20, 2017 at 13:52:38.
In reply to WISPER MODE posted by Mark V on October 20, 2017
USB with a dial frequency of 474.200 should give you results for WSPR-2 decoding.
Make sure you click the correct button to start a receive session.
73, J.B., VE3EAR 630m QSO
Posted by Sal, K1RGO on October 20, 2017 at 23:16:57.
I made my 1st contact on 630 with NO3M in PA,2 days ago around 2130hrs. Re: wisper mode
He was 559 and so was I. It was a short QSO since he was having drift problems.
There was lots of QRN but it should improve by winter I would guess.
later.....
Sal,K1RGO
Posted by Mark V on October 20, 2017 at 23:35:14.
In reply to wisper mode posted by John Bruce McCreath on October 20, 2017
Are you talking about WSPR Version 2? Refereed to as WSPR 2 ? That's what we are using, but no luck. A friend is also using that and so far both of use are coming up dry for some reason. Need to just be persistent I guess. Western LOWfer net in the morning
Thanks,
Mark v
Posted by Jerry Parker on October 21, 2017 at 01:31:41.
Hope you will join us on 3927 Khz at 0800 California time.
Re: wisper mode
Posted by Frank Lotito on October 21, 2017 at 02:05:56.
In reply to Re: wisper mode posted by Mark V on October 20, 2017
If you are using a receiving converter, are you listening on the correct side band? For example (using simple numbers), if the a transmitting station information bandwidth is 500 to 501 KHz, and the converter's local oscillator is 3000 KHz, the converter's output "could" be 3500-3501 KHz. If the transmitting station is 500 to 501 KHz, and the local oscillator is 4000 KHz, the converter output "could" be 3500 to 3499 KHz. Note, the information side band for the 4000 KHz example is reversed if the receiver used USB. 73 Frank K3DZ / WH2XHA
Re: 630m QSO
Posted by Chuck, N1KGY on October 21, 2017 at 02:14:35.
In reply to 630m QSO posted by Sal, K1RGO on October 20, 2017
What mode were you using, Sal? wisper mode
Tnx
Chuck
Posted by John Bruce McCreath on October 21, 2017 at 14:13:30.
In reply to Re: wisper mode posted by Frank Lotito on October 21, 2017
I don't use the original WSPR-2 software, but rather WSPR-X in the -2 mode, so that might be your trouble, too.
73, J.B., VE3EAR Re: UTC Rejection
Posted by Martin Wade on October 21, 2017 at 15:02:58.
In reply to Re: UTC Rejection posted by Mike N8OOU on October 12, 2017
I was denied due to incorrect and/or incomplete information. From Lindi Harron, I was asked to direct questions to Mike Etzel at plcdatabase@utc.org; I re submitted my info on October 19.
Todays LOWfer NET
Posted by Jerry Parker on October 21, 2017 at 17:20:37.
Hi everyone,
great net this morning with Dave WD4PLI, Clint KA7OEI, myself and Mike N8OUU in Illinois listening via WEBsdr KFS.
Dave is working on a commercially available amp modification for the new bands with hopes it will work well there.
Clint brought up his SDR activities and experiments etc.
I mentioned I brought out my old BC221 to calibrate the sdr here with the upverter. Surprised after all these years it still works.
Mike mentioned he is using RG6 for his feed lines on all his antennas for hf and VLF, including his active whip.
You can check Mikes pages here:
http://n8oou.meekfarm.us/index.html
I am working on getting my active whip up on the mesa behind my house fed with RG6.
Good net for us all.
Hope to see you next weekend, Please join us.
73's
Jerry Parker Re: WISPER MODE
WA6OWR
Posted by Mike N8OOU on October 21, 2017 at 17:28:29.
In reply to WISPER MODE posted by Mark V on October 20, 2017
Mark,
You may already have this covered, but in addition to the previous comments your PC needs to be within a second or so of the real time, plus your receive frequency must be stable during the 2 minute transmit window.
Re: 630m QSO
Posted by NO3M on October 22, 2017 at 02:57:37.
In reply to 630m QSO posted by Sal, K1RGO on October 20, 2017
Sal
Got the rig problems all worked out, so next time I can stick around longer.
73 GL DX LowFER antennas and ground systems.
Eric NO3M
Posted by Jerry Parker on October 22, 2017 at 14:05:10.
Here is a great resource on LowFER antennas and ground systems. Mike Medeke has tried it all. Read what works and what doesnt:
http://www.maxmcarter.com/lwantennas/1750mtxantennas.PDF
Re: WISPER MODE
Posted by Chuck, N1KGY on October 22, 2017 at 16:45:09.
In reply to Re: WISPER MODE posted by Mike N8OOU on October 21, 2017
Agreed. Keeping accurate time on the PC is essential. On several occasions I've found that failure to decode WSPR signals was resolved by doing an NTP sync.
I'd be very interested to learn what others are doing in terms of GPS or other [non-internet]means of disciplining their PC clock to achieve long-term stability for radio uses. This is particularly important for field-portable setups where a network connection is not readily available.
Thanks GNK the King
Chuck
Posted by Bill Hensel on October 23, 2017 at 13:15:02.
I was down by Foxton, Colorado trout fishing Sunday for most of the day. At 1823 utc
I decided to take a break and pull out the KA 1103 nad GNK was blasting in..at 2202 utc I pulled it out again and GNK was Rock Solid Copy (remember that phrase on cw)
No other Hifer were heard...I was hoping I might hear PCO reflecting off an airplane but no joy...
Re: GNK the King
Posted by ed holland on October 23, 2017 at 16:42:03.
In reply to GNK the King posted by Bill Hensel on October 23, 2017
Nice report Bill,
I listened a little this weekend, but couldn't get to the desk at the right times, so no reports.
PVC was on and off over the weekend. This culminated in quite a bit of servicing - I found a bad contact in the ATU, and then decided to check out the terminal box at the base of the mast that supports the dipole. Sure enough, bad/corroded connections. These were stripped back and remade, then given a shot of battery terminal spray for added protection.
Measuring off the other aerial, the work seems to have restored a few dB.
Cheers and 73's
Ed
630M transmitters shaping up, here
Posted by Chuck, N1KGY on October 23, 2017 at 20:30:47.
Ordered today a QRP-Labs U3S for use as an exciter for 136 and 475 Khz for WSPR and other digital modes. 136Khz won't happen for me this season, but 475 certainly can - I have a 190' inverted-L here at the house that I'm going to wind a coil for; and I have a span of well over 100' wide and ~80' high that I'll set up a Marconi Tee antenna out at my rural property.
I've got a downconverter breadboarded and working for 475Khz, which I'll use here at the house, but when I look at the power budget for an HF rig, downconverter, laptop, and MF-PA, it's just not feasible to set all that up at my remote property running on solar power (there's no electric utility on the property), plus the challenge of keeping the laptop clock sync'ed so that WSPR will encode properly.
Also of consideration is the fact that I don't want to put a rather expensive HF rig and laptop in an unattended box, outside in the elements, for an indefinite period - that just sounds too much like "destructive testing" to me. Hi Hi.
After researching what was available, I found that the U3S was the best integrated solution available for a solar-powered WSPR station - RF synthesis, WSPR message encoding, and GPS-sync'ed clock all together drawing less than half an amp, in a package smaller than a paperback book. I'll put it in the same enclosure with the P-P IRF-640 amplifier I've just finished building, and the whole station will only draw about 6 amps on TX. So if my antenna gives me 10% efficiency, I'll get 5W/EIRP - if the antenna efficiency is higher then I'll just trim back the PA output. Yeah, I'm a radio optimist ;P
Assuming a "100 watt" solar panel will give me about 6A/hr * 9 hours (on a good day), or 54AH of power, I should be able to run up to 20% dutycycle without issues using a "35AH" marine battery.
I'll rig up a simple load controller that can disable the system if/when the low-battery threshold is reached, but I don't expect it will need to suspend the load very often. At 15% dutycycle [one TX cycle each 15 minutes] -- which is the most I'd probably run for WSPR -- the beacon should be able to run continuously, even considering the probability of sub-optimal solar output for several days in a row, with poor weather over the winter.
The U3S, with GPS option, including BPFs for 630, 40, and 20 meters, came to a grand total of $75 including shipping. So if it lives up to its published spec's, it's quite a good deal.
Now lets see how long it takes to arrive from the UK.
JT9 Mode
Posted by Tom N8TL on October 24, 2017 at 00:02:08.
Is there currently anyone on 630 or 2200 Meters using mode JT9. I would like to see JT9 Mode on 630M
that mode and its performance. Thanks, 73, Tom N8TL
Posted by Tom N8TL on October 24, 2017 at 00:20:10.
Gee.....I guess I spoke too soon....just witnessed QSO between W9XA and K5DNL on JT9 mode
using 630M band. W9XA was -27 and K5DNL was -25 here in NW Ohio. WA9CGZ calling K5DNL at
-25.
Tom N8TL
Re: 630m QSO
Posted by Sal,K1RGO on October 24, 2017 at 01:07:17.
In reply to Re: 630m QSO posted by Chuck, N1KGY on October 21, 2017
I was using cw, I will also run QRSS3 "manned beacon" for a while and use spectran or argo WA4SZE copied
for receiving at times if that mode gets going. Skeds can be made, should be fun.
later........
Sal, K1RGO
Posted by Sal,K1RGO on October 24, 2017 at 01:27:53.
At ~ 19:30 EDT local, 23:30 UTC, I was hearing WA4SZE cw beacon on 475.99 kHz quite well around 549 to 569. There was some breaking up of the message however. Re: 630m QSO
I will run my beacon , cw and /or QRSS3 on 476.270 kHz time TBD.
Later..
Sal, K1RGO
Posted by Chuck, N1KGY on October 24, 2017 at 23:52:14.
In reply to Re: 630m QSO posted by Sal,K1RGO on October 24, 2017
Thanks Sal. I have some time Saturday afternoon set aside for antenna work... if all goes well I'll be testing & looking for QSOs by sundown Saturday. CW first, then we'll give digital modes a try. JT9 Mode on 630M
73, Chuck
Posted by John Bruce McCreath on October 25, 2017 at 15:59:46.
In reply to JT9 Mode on 630M posted by Tom N8TL on October 24, 2017
I’ll be set up to watch for JT9 signals on 474.200 kHz. dial for the next few days.
73, J.B., VE3EAR
LowFER Beacon "EAR"
188.830 kHz. QRSS30
EN93dr
Lowfer TAG Remaining Off
Posted by John, W1TAG on October 25, 2017 at 18:16:03.
Lowfer TAG will not be on the air this winter. I had to take the antenna and associated wiring down this fall to allow for tree removal and a new septic system. That project has taken longer than expected, and there isn't enough time to bring TAG back to life before we leave this month. I will hopefully come up with something next summer.
John, W1TAG
Re: JT9 Mode on 630M
Posted by Tom on October 25, 2017 at 22:05:48.
In reply to JT9 Mode on 630M posted by John Bruce McCreath on October 25, 2017
Hi JB:
Yes...I will be watching for JT9 signals as well. JT9 is a robust mode for LF.
Tom
Re: Lowfering this season
Posted by John Davis on October 26, 2017 at 02:34:38.
In reply to Lowfering this season posted by Lee on September 21, 2017
Lee wrote:
With all the excitement over the two new bands, any interest leftover for the 1 watt no license band.
Yes. While I won't be able to monitor much this winter, there are several stalwarts who will still be doing so.
Re: JT9 Mode on 630M
Posted by John Bruce McCreath on October 26, 2017 at 13:56:41.
In reply to JT9 Mode on 630M posted by Tom N8TL on October 24, 2017
October 26th. 2017 JT9 Mode 474.200 kHz.
2344 -7 0.3 1206 @ WA3ETD WA9CGZ EN61
2348 -5 0.6 1205 @ CQ K9SLQ EN70
2349 -13 0.1 1201 @ K9SLQ VE3CIQ FN15
2350 -10 0.4 1250 @ WA3ETD WA9CGZ EN61
2350 -2 0.7 1205 @ CQ K9SLQ EN70
2352 -20 0.3 1250 @ WA3ETD WA9CGZ EN61
2352 -6 0.6 1206 @ CQ K9SLQ EN70
2354 -15 0.2 1250 @ WA3ETD WA9CGZ EN61
2358 -17 -0.0 410 @ N1DAY NO3M EN91
2359 -22 0.0 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0008 -18 0.4 1007 @ CQ WA9CGZ EN61
0010 -26 0.3 1006 @ N1DAY WA9CGZ -22
0013 -22 0.0 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0015 -25 0.5 1099 @ CQ K2BLA EL99
0015 -22 0.2 1302 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0016 -7 0.0 1207 @ CQ K9SLQ EN70
0017 -23 0.1 1302 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0019 -20 0.0 1302 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0025 -3 0.1 1203 @ CQ WA3ETD FN33
0026 0 0.2 1202 @ WA3ETD WA9CGZ EN61
0027 -4 0.3 1202 @ VE3CIQ WA3ETD -08
0029 -7 0.1 1203 @ TNX PHIL
0030 -7 -1.3 1198 @ WA3ETD VE3CIQ 73
0031 -3 0.2 1203 @ CQ WA3ETD FN33
0033 3 0.1 1203 @ WA9CGZ WA3ETD -26
0035 0 0.2 1203 @ WA9CGZ WA3ETD -26
0038 -7 0.3 1203 @ WA3ETD WA9CGZ R-13
0040 -15 0.4 1227 @ WA3ETD WA9CGZ R-13
0120 1 0.1 1198 @ K2BLA AA1A -20
0122 -6 0.2 1198 @ K2BLA AA1A -20
0130 -20 0.1 1133 @ K9SLQ VE3CIQ RRR
0132 -21 0.1 1133 @ K9SLQ VE3CIQ RRR
0140 -19 0.4 1243 @ N9EGT WA9CGZ EN61
0142 -11 0.1 1279 @ CQ VE3CIQ FN15
0142 -23 0.3 1331 @ N9EGT WA9CGZ R-24
0144 -11 0.1 1292 @ CQ VE3CIQ FN15
0144 -20 0.3 1331 @ N9EGT WA9CGZ R-24
0150 -21 0.2 1052 @ ZF1EJ WA9CGZ EN61
0156 -25 0.3 1104 @ ZF1EJ WA9CGZ EN61
0157 -18 0.1 1322 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0158 -19 0.3 1104 @ ZF1EJ WA9CGZ EN61
0159 -18 0.4 1322 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0226 -6 0.3 1206 @ CQ K9SLQ EN70
0305 20 0.1 1176 @ N8OOU NO3M -21
0307 17 0.1 1176 @ N8OOU NO3M -21
0310 -7 -0.3 1051 @ VE7SL NO3M EN91
0312 -19 0.1 1006 @ CQ W9XA EN51
0325 -7 0.1 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0327 -3 0.0 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0334 -20 0.1 1289 @ CQ K9MRI EN70
0336 -17 -0.3 1288 @ CQ K9MRI EN70
0340 -21 0.1 1055 @ VE7SL K5DNL EM15
0340 -14 0.3 1287 @ CQ K9MRI EN70
0342 -20 0.1 1055 @ VE7SL K5DNL R-20
0342 -10 0.2 1285 @ CQ K9MRI EN70
0344 -21 0.1 1055 @ VE7SL K5DNL 73
0344 -15 0.0 1285 @ CQ K9MRI EN70
0346 -25 0.3 1055 @ VE7SL K5DNL 73
0346 20 0.1 1176 @ VE7SL NO3M EN91
0348 -14 0.1 1055 @ VE7SL NO3M EN91
0350 -13 0.1 1055 @ VE7SL NO3M R-27
0350 -14 0.2 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0352 -3 0.1 1055 @ VE7SL NO3M 73
0352 -14 0.1 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0353 -5 0.0 1253 @ CQ K9MRI EN70
0354 -8 0.1 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0355 -6 -0.2 1252 @ CQ K9MRI EN70
0356 -7 -0.1 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0357 -7 0.0 1252 @ CQ K9MRI EN70
0358 -7 -0.2 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0400 -11 0.4 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0401 -14 -0.1 1251 @ CQ K9MRI EN70
0402 -13 0.3 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0404 -6 0.1 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0406 -4 0.0 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
0440 -20 0.3 1055 @ VE7SL WA9CGZ EN61
0442 -9 0.4 1055 @ VE7SL WA9CGZ EN61
0746 -1 0.7 1177 @ CQ K9SLQ EN70
0748 12 0.7 1176 @ CQ K9SLQ EN70
0914 -13 0.3 1249 @ CQ AA1A FN42
0916 -15 0.1 1249 @ CQ AA1A FN42
0918 -14 0.2 1249 @ CQ AA1A FN42
0919 1 0.1 1249 @ AA1A NO3M EN91
0924 -16 0.2 1247 @ NO3M AA1A -09
0925 7 0.1 1249 @ AA1A NO3M R-19
0926 -17 0.2 1247 @ NO3M AA1A -09
0927 3 0.1 1249 @ AA1A NO3M R-19
0928 -11 0.2 1247 @ NO3M AA1A RRR
0929 7 0.1 1249 @ AA1A NO3M 73
0930 -3 0.2 1248 @ NO3M AA1A 73
0932 -12 0.2 1248 @ NO3M AA1A 73
0934 -20 0.2 1309 @ CQ W8RUT EN80
0936 -15 0.3 1247 @ CQ AA1A FN42
0936 -11 0.2 1310 @ CQ W8RUT EN80
0937 -3 0.1 1310 @ W8RUT NO3M EN91
0938 -16 0.1 1309 @ NO3M W8RUT -03
0939 -7 0.2 1310 @ W8RUT NO3M R-10
0940 -13 0.3 1238 @ K2BLA AA1A -21
0941 6 0.1 1310 @ W8RUT NO3M 73
0942 -5 0.2 1238 @ K2BLA AA1A R-21
0943 -16 0.4 1239 @ AA1A K2BLA RRR
0944 -14 0.3 1238 @ K2BLA AA1A 73
0945 -10 0.3 1239 @ TNX QSO 73
0946 -17 0.1 1300 @ CQ W8RUT EN80
0947 -13 0.4 1291 @ W8RUT K2BLA EL99
0949 -22 0.2 1291 @ W8RUT K2BLA R-15
0950 -23 -0.1 1292 @ K2BLA W8RUT RRR
0951 -15 0.2 1291 @ W8RUT K2BLA 73
0952 -13 0.1 1292 @ K2BLA W8RUT 73
0954 -17 0.2 1291 @ CQ W8RUT EN80
0956 -12 0.2 1292 @ CQ W8RUT EN80
1023 -13 0.3 1249 @ CQ K2BLA EL99
1040 -17 0.1 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
1045 -18 0.2 1298 @ CQ AA1A FN42
1046 -7 0.1 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
1047 -19 0.3 1298 @ CQ AA1A FN42
1048 -14 0.0 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
1052 -18 0.1 1272 @ CQ AA1A FN42
1052 -21 0.3 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
1053 -11 0.4 1200 @ CQ K2BLA EL99
1054 -15 0.1 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
1101 -12 0.5 1200 @ CQ K2BLA EL99
1102 -20 0.1 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
1114 -13 0.3 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
1115 -8 0.1 1101 @ W5EMC NO3M EN91
1116 -11 0.0 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
1117 -12 0.0 1101 @ W5EMC NO3M R-23
1118 -11 0.2 1303 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
1119 -10 -0.0 1101 @ W5EMC NO3M 73
1120 -11 0.1 1302 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
1122 -14 -0.0 1302 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
1140 -15 0.0 1302 @ CQ K5DNL EM15
73, J.B., VE3EAR
G1 storm and Hifer enhancement
Posted by Bill Hensel on October 26, 2017 at 20:29:22.
Just checked the band and GNK was banging in to Pine, Co at 2027 utc
630m activity
Posted by Sal,K1RGO on October 26, 2017 at 23:30:31.
Well not much cw activity, but I did try to make QSO with K4EJQ but was unsuccessful. I had a weak copy on him on 472.4 kHz,429............ PVC at Last into Colorado
later Sal, K1RGO
Posted by Bill Hensel on October 27, 2017 at 22:27:10.
Oct 27 time 2218 utc heard at last 10 ids in a row on Freq. 13558.200 khz with the GNK and K6FRC
pass band narrowed on the icom 756...
Posted by Bill Hensel on October 27, 2017 at 22:36:24.
Oct 27 2229 utc GNK and FRC blasting into Colorado.
2200M WSPR 10/27
Posted by Tom N8TL on October 28, 2017 at 00:04:32.
0004 -28 4.2 0.137527 0 WH2XND DM33 43 2710 Re: PVC at Last into Colorado
0020 -30 4.1 0.137527 0 WH2XND DM33 43 2710
0140 -21 4.2 0.137527 0 WH2XND DM33 43 2710
0144 -28 4.1 0.137527 0 WH2XND DM33 43 2710
0148 -27 4.1 0.137527 0 WH2XND DM33 43 2710
0152 -27 4.1 0.137527 0 WH2XND DM33 43 271
Posted by ed holland on October 28, 2017 at 00:08:42.
In reply to PVC at Last into Colorado posted by Bill Hensel on October 27, 2017
Hi Bill,
Thanks for the reports - Good to know that PVC is struggling out again. Last weekend saw quite a bit of maintenance on the aerial and ATU - must have been worth it.
Lets see if PCO responds this weekend ;-)
73s,
Ed
LOWfer Net reminder....3927 Khz 0800 Sat California time
Posted by Jerry Parker on October 28, 2017 at 00:32:51.
Hope to have you join us.
Re: PVC at Last into Colorado
Posted by Bill Hensel on October 28, 2017 at 02:52:07.
In reply to Re: PVC at Last into Colorado posted by ed holland on October 28, 2017
Ed,
Sure sounded good and I like the fast speed Id much easier to copy..
UTC Approval Format
Posted by Bob Magill on October 28, 2017 at 14:04:17.
Hello All -- A quick inquiry as to the format of UTC approvals that have been received so far. What I see is that the UTC has been sending approval emails -- is this the norm?? Others been getting emails?? I am about one week out from the 30 day point and have heard nothing so far. Just wondering what to expect. Regards --- Bob K6WL
This mornings LOWfer net
Posted by Jerry Parker on October 28, 2017 at 15:52:02.
Lots of good discussion this morning on active antennas and noise cancelling as well as modifying amplifiers for use on the new amateur bands.
I am scouting a couple of power poles and preparing to build an antenna site on the mesa behind the house.
A good ground system and the antenna suspended between the power poles with a dog house for the beacon in the middle.
Thanks everyone for joining in, see you next week.
73's,
Jerry Parker Re: PVC at Last into Colorado
WA6OWR
Posted by Bill Hensel on October 28, 2017 at 22:07:39.
In reply to PVC at Last into Colorado posted by Bill Hensel on October 27, 2017
Oct 28 2143 utc very nice copy on PVC
Re: GNK and K6FRC
Posted by Bill Hensel on October 28, 2017 at 22:09:17.
In reply to GNK and K6FRC posted by Bill Hensel on October 27, 2017
Oct 28 2145 utc GNK pounding into Colorado no FRC heard sure like the faster ID on PVC Hifer TAG On
takes advantage of the rapid fade ups on 13 mc.
Posted by John, W1TAG on October 29, 2017 at 14:26:05.
Hifer TAG in Raymond, ME, (FN43sv) is back on the air for the winter on 13555.415 kHz in QRSS3. It will hopefully be on until May. Reports are always welcome.
John, W1TAG
Hifer Reports 29 October
Posted by Ed Holland on October 30, 2017 at 02:41:36.
Hi Folks,
Just a quick report from some listening and Spectrum Lab Monitoring today.
Firstly - I am happy to return Bills report of PVC with one for PCO on 13,563.55 kHz. Visible only today, not quite audible, but a positive log of the signal for many copies, around 16:00 PST+DST (0:00 UTC 30th Oct)
Add to this GNK, audible and visible on 13,563.99 kHz, AZ very strongly audible i.e. in the next room on 13,554 kHz.
Add to this two mysteries that sounded like beacons operating CW. One at 13,557 kHz, and another at 13,563.25 which might be KC7MMI, but I could not get sufficient detail to resolve an ID.
I did not get a chance/time to monitor the watering hole today.
Nice to see some action in the HiFER band. Activity was consistent with the mid-late afternoon lifts often seen here.
Best regards,
Ed
Re: UTC Approval Format
Posted by Ed, KI6R on October 30, 2017 at 04:08:10.
In reply to UTC Approval Format posted by Bob Magill on October 28, 2017
I'm past the 30-day notice point and have heard nothing from UTC. This means I should be good to go. I'll be working on the transmitter during the next few weeks.
Re: UTC Approval Format
Posted by Bob Magill K6WL on October 30, 2017 at 16:21:11.
In reply to Re: UTC Approval Format posted by Ed, KI6R on October 30, 2017
OK, thanks for the info. I am about 5-6 days away and have heard nothing. Will see what happens. Looking forward to some fun experimentation. Bob K6WL 73s
Re: UTC Approval Format
Posted by Chuck, N1KGY on October 30, 2017 at 19:04:53.
In reply to Re: UTC Approval Format posted by Ed, KI6R on October 30, 2017
Same here Ed, it's been 42 days since I submitted, and I've received no response.
My 630M amplifier is ready to go, and I've ordered a QRPlabs U3S to use as an exciter on 630M (it will do 2200M also, but I'm not trying to get on 2200M this season - that's a project for next spring/summer.
I'm a nit-pick about documentation, so I would be a lot more confortable had I received at least a confirmation of my submissions, but I guess that's not how they're running things. I have screen-shots of my submissions, so I guess that will have to be 'good enough'.
73, Chuck
SJ
Posted by Mark -- WA9ETW on October 30, 2017 at 21:28:54.
Sal -- K1RGO -- Do you QSL reception reports (screen captures) of SJ?
Tnx es 73,
Mark -- WA9ETW
Re: SJ
Posted by Sal,K1RGO on October 31, 2017 at 01:31:58.
In reply to SJ posted by Mark -- WA9ETW on October 30, 2017
I don't have a specific card for SJ and haven't yet sent a QSL. But I have some 40 yr old K1RGO cards left I can modify a bit if needed. Re: SJ
later,
Sal
Posted by John Davis on October 31, 2017 at 02:16:43.
In reply to Re: SJ posted by Sal,K1RGO on October 31, 2017
Is SJ on for the season now?
LowFER SIW OTA
Posted by Garry K3SIW on October 31, 2017 at 02:18:03.
Had a power problem that impacted 185.185 kHz transmissions while I was out of town. Got to the site today but the needed repair wasn't obvious so I now have the lowfer on my work bench. QRSS30/60 works fine on 185.2993 kHz (thanks for looking Andy) and that's the way it's been running until this afternoon. Hope to get it QRV again soon. Re: SJ
--
73, Garry, K3SIW, EN52ta, Elgin, IL
Posted by Mark -- WA9ETW on October 31, 2017 at 04:09:09.
In reply to Re: SJ posted by Sal,K1RGO on October 31, 2017
That would be great! What's your email address, Sal -- I'll send you a screen shot.
Mark -- WA9ETW
Re: SJ
Posted by Mark -- WA9ETW on October 31, 2017 at 04:09:44.
In reply to Re: SJ posted by John Davis on October 31, 2017
From last season, John.
Mark
LOWFER QSO
Posted by Mark -- WA9ETW on October 31, 2017 at 04:13:42.
Maybe not such a big deal with the advent of the new MF/LF bands, but when was the last actual LOWFER/LOWFER QSO? Has anybody tried "recently" with any of the digital modes.
Mark -- WA9ETW
Re: SJ
Posted by Sal, K1RGO on October 31, 2017 at 14:22:07.
In reply to Re: SJ posted by John Davis on October 31, 2017
Hi John Re: SJ
Since I am going to be occupied with 630 meters I am going to run SJ by request.
The best times will be after 22:00 local overnight to 9:00 local. SJ is off as of now.
Hopefully there will be more cw activity on 630 m, I worked NO3M nr Erie ,PA so far and tried to work K4EJQ in TN with out success but did copy him FB.
later.Sal, K1RGO
Posted by Sal, K1RGO on October 31, 2017 at 14:26:20.
In reply to Re: SJ posted by Mark -- WA9ETW on October 31, 2017
Sure looking forward for your screen shot. If you want I can send a modified 40 yr old QSL card....... hi Re: LOWFER QSO
Later.....
Sal,K1RGO
Posted by Sal, K1RGO on October 31, 2017 at 14:38:21.
In reply to LOWFER QSO posted by Mark -- WA9ETW on October 31, 2017
I had a CW QSO back in 2007ish it should be in the LWCA archives I forgot his Ham call, It was a daytime CW QSO on 185ish kHz. It was a 50 mile distance his location in a bordering NW CT part of MA. I may have logged it but I would have to search. He has been inactive for quite a while. In the 1970s/80s there were quite a few local lowfers here in CT and I made lots of CW QSOs on 1750 meters. Re: SJ
later........
Sal, K1RGO
Posted by Mark -- WA9ETW on October 31, 2017 at 18:21:28.
In reply to Re: SJ posted by Sal, K1RGO on October 31, 2017
On its way this afternoon. Thanks, Sal!
Mark -- WA9ETW
GNK Good Sig. Into NC
Posted by Bill, K4JYS on October 31, 2017 at 20:41:57.
Just listened to GNK for a half hour or so. Time from around 1955Z to 2027Z. Sigs ranged from about RST 229 to around 549 on QSB peaks. There was a weak digital sig about 1kc below, but other wise freq. was pretty clear. I was using the R-388/URR with a 160m off center fed hertz antenna.
73 de Bill K4JYS
U3S shipped today
Posted by Chuck, N1KGY on October 31, 2017 at 21:06:34.
Received email about an hour ago that my U3S kit has shipped from QRPLabs.
Had a very positive email exchange with Hans (the proprietor) when I asked about typical shipping times. He explained that they're seriously backlogged because they've received nearly 2000 orders in the last 90 days (mainly for their new QCX CW/WSPR HF kit), but he offered to expedite mine when I explained that I planned to put it on 630/2200 meters and already had an amp and antenna ready to go.
I've bought/built a lot of kits over the years, and so far QRPLabs is making "top of the list" for outstanding customer service. Will keep everyone posted.
73, Chuck
potrzebie