Testsignal of transmitter on 22.3 kHz again on air!
Posted by Harald on November 02, 2004 at 14:49:58
On November 2nd, 2004 between 12 UTC and 13 UTC I received again the predicted testsignal of the unidentified, presumable Russian, transmitter on 22300 Hertz. The signal is clearly visible on the spectroram.
TUK officially decommissioned
Posted by William Hepburn on November 02, 2004 at 15:21:33
Longtime LW powerhouse TUK 194 kHz Nantucket, MA will officially be decommissioned as of 2004 Nov 25. The power was greatly reduced and the weather broadcasts were dropped a while ago - now officially TUK will be no more. It will be missed. I've also noticed that LQ 382 Boston has no weather. If the Boston TWEB has been decommissioned, then that will leave the Princeton, MN TWEB as the only one left in the continental US (I heard the Princeton broadcast on IN Int'l Falls a couple of nights ago).
Re: VLF Up Converter Comments and Questions
Posted by Ray W2RS on November 02, 2004 at 15:26:44
Jim,
As John said, the answer depends on what you want to use it for.
I have an old British-made Datong VLF converter, with a 28 MHz IF, that I bought from Alan, G3NYK, a couple of years ago. It does just what it's supposed to do and is stable enough as long as you're careful not to put it in a place where the ambient temperature is likely to vary much.
The real stability issue, I have found, is the IF receiver itself. 1 ppm, which is pretty good as far as HF receivers/transceivers go, is 28 Hz at 28 MHz. That's good enough for listening to NDBs, LW broadcasts, CW beacons at 10 WPM, even QRSS3, but it just won't cut it if you're interested in listening for QRSS30 or even slower speeds. For that, you need a dedicated LF receiver with a TCXO, oven or something similar.
Hope this helps.
73, Ray
Re: VLF Up Converter Comments and Questions
Posted by Alan G3NYK on November 02, 2004 at 19:59:15
Hi Ray, that must have been at the Norwich Rally at Barford. I did not realise that was you but always wondered where it ended up. I vaguely remembered the soft Stateside accent. But we are quite used to that in this region with a lot of your Air Force personnel posted locally. (Our local base at Bentwaters closed some years ago, but a number of aviation nuts locally keep the flag flying on the old Martlesham Heath Control Tower, which is located a few yards beyond by back fence. The upper floor has been turned into a museum and is stuffed with photos) There are usually a few veterans over here for the events over the 13/14th.)
I am glad the Datong was put to good use and served its purpose.
Best Wishes de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com
Re: VLF Up Converter Comments and Questions
Posted by Tim Brannon KF5CQ on November 03, 2004 at 00:37:29
Jim,
I agree with the comments of Ray and John. The converter approach works well if you are interested in NDB beacons or LF broadcasting. But if you are interested in BPSK or the QRSS LowFER beacons then frequency stability is a big issue.
Even in a well-constructed crystal oscillator will have some drift in the milliHertz range per hour; a 1 Hz drift over an hour can make an ARGO display very difficult to interpret for a weak signal at QRSS 30 and above. If the drift of the converter local oscillator and the IF receiver LO cancel each other out then your're OK, but that's certainly not a given.
If you have a reciever that tunes to LF, even with poor sensitivity, some operators here have reported good results by just adding a good pre-amp. The receiver antenna is always very important; a random wire plugged to the antenna input will not work well. Good receiver antenna matching makes a world of difference at LF.
Tim
Re: VLF Up Converter Comments and Questions
Posted by Ray, W2RS on November 03, 2004 at 09:17:07
Hi Alan,
Yes, that was me at Barford. I've hooked the converter up to a Wellbrook LFL-1010 active loop, and it's been working fine ever since.
Hope all is well with you.
73, Ray
Just in case you have Free CPU time and idle radio....
Posted by Peter Knol on November 04, 2004 at 18:47:06
Hello Beacon DXers,
Just in case you have some free CPU time and a idle radio, then I'll like to let you know that I have activated my HiFer TX today on 13.555,450 Mhz. Details are published on http://hifer-nl.8k.com/ and the actual frequency is visible in my live Spectran Grabber on http://home.wanadoo.nl/cyberknol/Argocaptures/ .
TX output is 1,8 mW ANT is Dipole @ 6 m from the floor Modulation pattern looks like a Asymmetric Sawtooth
8 Hz shift and 12 sec cycle speed.
Grid is JO33KH
73, Peter PA1SDB
Re: TUK officially decommissioned
Posted by Chris Steele on November 05, 2004 at 22:21:27
Well that means I will probably never log it here in Texas
Southern Sweden Beverage antenna
Posted by Mike E Terry on November 06, 2004 at 12:12:19
6 November 2004
DXTuners have announced that due to popular demand the Southern Sweden Beverage antenna site will be returning very soon and this time the beam of the beverage will likely be towards USA.
Should be some interesting LW catches!
http://www.dxtuners.com/servlet/IBMainServlet/?ib_page=1
California DGPS logged in Ontario
Posted by William Hepburn on November 07, 2004 at 03:51:12
The Lincoln, CA DGPS beacon has been logged here in Grimsby, ON! Frequency 314 kHz. Ref station # 211 messages received several times. Corresponds to station ID # 764.
Details decoded with SkySweeper software follows..
November 7, 2004 03:38:40
Preamble : 102 Message Type : 9 GPS Partial Correction Set Station Number : 211 Z Count : 3895 Sequency Count : 1 Num of Data Words : 5 Health : 3 UDRE scale factor = 0.3 Satellite Id : 18
User Diff Range Error : < 1 m
Pseudorange Correction : -1.66 m
Range Rate Correction : 0.006 m/s
Issue of Data : 204 Satellite Id : 3
User Diff Range Error : < 1 m
Pseudorange Correction : -0.52 m
Range Rate Correction : -0.002 m/s
Issue of Data : 170 Satellite Id : 7
User Diff Range Error : < 1 m
Pseudorange Correction : 654.20 m
Range Rate Correction : 0.252 m/s
Issue of Data : 178
Message Contains Parity Errors
lofers heard in NE Oregon
Posted by Steve Ratzlaff on November 07, 2004 at 09:24:10
Last night lofer MO received; this morning XGI and FAW received on Argo. Lofer NW, at about 350 miles, is usually daytime copy.
Steve AA7U NE Oregon
Publications, International Omega Assoc.
Posted by Frank Lotito, K3DZ on November 09, 2004 at 11:21:57
Can someone help with 1980 and 1981 articles published in the Journal of the International Omega Association? Specifically, I am interested in reviewing the articles on ELF by F. C. White, 1980, "A Case For ELF" and by F. H. Reder, 1981, "ELF Propagation."
I am the Below 535 column editor for the Antique Wireless Association's (AWA) publication "The OTB." I am researching a future article on ELF.
A great help will be suggesting a USA based library that has these publications.
Thank you-
Frank J. Lotito K3DZ Pittsburgh, PA 15239
Re: Publications, International Omega Assoc.
Posted by Lloyd chastant on November 09, 2004 at 21:52:10
http://courseweb.tac.unt.edu/gknezek/99fall/cecs5400/papers/chris.htm
Frank I assume you ran across this article..seems it only references the two authors..don't know if that would lead anywhere??/
Lloyd W3NF
Manitoba NDB Listing
Posted by Alan Schoberg on November 10, 2004 at 03:13:38
While looking for info on some unid NDBs in my log, I found this web page listing northern Manitoba airports and their NDB info:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/tgs/namo/airports.html
WD2XGJ testing
Posted by Warren WD2XGJ on November 10, 2004 at 22:24:49
I am testing my Part 5 station WD2XGJ on 137.572 +/- a little drift. Sending cw id's at about 5 wpm.
Running approx. 250 watts out into an Ashlock Loop (Thanks Bill!)
Reports are welcome.
73 Warren WD2XGJ/K2ORS
WD2XGJ/WD2XES First "Part 5" QSO
Posted by John Andrews on November 12, 2004 at 07:17:30
Warren Ziegler, WD2XGJ (K2ORS), and myself (WD2XES/W1TAG) completed the first known U.S. "Part 5" QSO in the 137 kHz band last night. We used hand-keyed CW for the contact from 0200 to 0227 UTC (12 Nov). The "WD2" Experimental call signs were used, not our ham calls.
Warren was running 250 watts into a 150 foot long by 70 foot high loop antenna. I ran 200 watts into a 65 foot by 40 foot loop. The distance between us is only 25 miles. The QSO was copied by Jay Rusgrove, W1VD, in Connecticut. Jay has a > MP3 file of the QSO available at:
http://www.advancedreceiver.com/capture/XESXGJ.mp3
John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES
transmitting antennas and ground systems for 1750 meters
Posted by Max Carter on November 15, 2004 at 11:26:59
Twelve years ago Mike Mideke sent me the original paste-up for this booklet, a compilation of 26 articles dealing with longwave transmitting antennas selected from the pages of THE LOWDOWN and 1750 METER WESTERN UPDATE. I recently got around to posting it. See: http://www.maxmcarter.com/lwantennas/index.html
Re: transmitting antennas and ground systems for 1750 meters - a caution
Posted by Alan G3NYK on November 15, 2004 at 20:05:07
Hi Max, that makes some interesting reading. I have seen a few of the pieces before, but I have a caution to sound. A lot more and wider experience has been gained since these articles were written, and whilst they are probably still pertiment to the Part 15 regulations, some of the comments are now inaccurate when considered against the possibilities of a Part 5 station not limited by the 50 foot rule.
I have not had time to read all the articles yet but I do not see many attempts to actually measure the aerial parameters. If this had been done it would have been found that there are experimental conditions where an inductive top-load is a distinct advantage (and others where it is on no use) Most also makes the mistake of extrapolating the commercial idea of verticals and grounding, which dont prove very effective with the size of aerial that amateur can usually raise. I see no mention of the effect of capacitive top-loading reducing the ground loss. This may be due to the fact that you need a lot more wire out than the height of the antenna to achieve this. As a ball park figure doubling the length of top wire (even in a meander) halves the ground loss, and so gives a 6dB ERP advantage. There is the unfortunate situation where the top-wire would have to pass over a buildings or be stretched over trees or even bushes when all the extra top-wire does is increase the losses. UK and European experience is based on locations generally not over-looked by very high trees. Recent work on loop antennas by the Part 5 licencees has proved that to be the way to go when you are surrounded by tall trees. Similarly inductive top-loading only shows advantages in reducing the volage on the bottom of the antenna and reducing the loss due to the coupling to the surrounding lossy environment of houses, shrubs and trees.
My own advice to anyone considering trying to improve their LF antenna (Part 15 or Part 5)is to build a simple bridge to measure the unloaded (ie not resonated) antenna parameters ( C, Rrad, and Rloss in series). The resistance value you monitor will mainly be the loss as the radiation resistance is vanishing small in comparison.Then monitor these as you try changes, and you can save yourself a lot of agro laying miles of ground wire for a miniscule improvement in signal. Remember a 100 foor diameter radial mat at LF is like expecting to improve an 80m antenna by putting out 3 foot radials. Of course there is no limitation to radials under Part 15, so you need to gain all you can (1500 feet long ??) You get some improvement with "amateur lengths" initially but soon reach a diminishing returns situation. I believe there may be a recent article somewhere about resonating "radials" from the remote end which does seem to achieve some advantages. I have not been able to find a copy of this yet.
Thanks for your efforts, I will enjoy reading the articles in full.
Cheers de Alan G3NYK
UNID NBD Query
Posted by Jim Renfrew on November 15, 2004 at 21:30:11
Just returned from a DXPedition in the Canadain Maritimes, and heard the following UNIDS. Help would be appreciated!
340 GP
376 HR
381 TRI
I heard NDBs from Azores, Canries, Cape Verde, Ascension and the Caribbean. The weeklong auroral conditions made reception of Euro NDBs impossible.
Re: UNID NBD Query
Posted by Eric KD5UWL on November 16, 2004 at 21:23:43
If you were in the Caribbean, I thought that perhaps TRI could be Trinidad and Tobago. I found this http://www.sunairexpress.com/tpa/files/ttpp/ttpp-ndb-rwy-10.pdf which shows POS (Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago) on 382.
Do they ever change the IDs? Could it have been POS once and TRI now? I'll be curious to know what you find out.
73 Eric
Re: UNID NBD Query
Posted by Jim Renfrew on November 16, 2004 at 23:56:20
TRI would certainly make one think of Trinidad & Tobago. The reception occured in Newfoundland, where I have previously heard POS and other Caribbean NDBs (Also Azores, Canaries and beyond!)
Re: WD2XGJ/WD2XES First "Part 5" QSO -- QRP question
Posted by Robert H on November 17, 2004 at 00:07:45
At this distance, was the signal strong enough for you to lower transmitter power? How QRP can you go, and still hear each other with standard CW?
Is SSB permitted under your Part 5 licenses? And, could one set up a "Field Day" 137 kHz station -- or does the antenna and grounding requirements make this impossible, restricting this band to home stations?
Congratulations on the contact!
73 Robert KB7AQD
Re: WD2XGJ/WD2XES First "Part 5" QSO -- QRP question
Posted by John Andrews on November 17, 2004 at 07:19:21
Robert,
No new ground was broken here, other than the contact between two Part 5 licensees. The contact could certainly have been completed with much less power, but we were hoping for an "audience."
QSO's in the 160-190 range under Part 15 rules used to be very common, and over greater distances than 25 miles. Lately, the focus has drifted toward beacon operation with slow speed techniques which would make for a very tedious 2-way contact. Jay Rusgrove and I did some 72 mile Part 15 QSOs last year on 185.8 kHz, using CW and various BPSK modes. Dex McIntyre and I had a 671 mile WOLF 2-way last winter that took 2 hours to complete.
The advantage of the higher power available to the Part 5 licensees is more freedom in picking the time and mode of the QSO. SSB really isn't very practical in a band that is 2.1 kHz wide, and with antenna BW's less than that! None of the Part 5 operators have asked for that mode.
The point of the Part 5 operation is to get more year round data on propagation, and to take the FCC up on their suggestion that Experimental licensees generate some RF down there to see if any effect is observed on the power companies' PLC operations. So far, so good. But being a QRP guy at heart, my sympathies are with the 1-watt gang. It's a big thrill to copy (and be copied) over hundreds of miles at that power level.
John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES
Re: UNID NBD Query
Posted by lloyd chastant on November 17, 2004 at 08:22:28
http://worldaerodata.com/
Jim, try this site ..think it will show those three you want..
de Lloyd W3NF
GP 341 Portugal HR 376 Spain TRI 382 Trinidad
Re: WD2XGJ/WD2XES First "Part 5" QSO -- QRP question
Posted by John Hoopes on November 17, 2004 at 16:23:56
John,
Sure was good to here you guys in a good old CW QSO. Sure brings back memories of the "Good old days"! If the FCC would ever allow us to run some power on the lowfer band, I might think about reactivating the LF station! LOL
John AB4MS ex JDH
Re: WD2XGJ/WD2XES First "Part 5" QSO -- QRP question
Posted by John Andrews on November 17, 2004 at 16:55:24
John,
I think I have a .wav file of JDH ID'ing in CW. Brings a tear to the old eye....
John Andrews
Re: transmitting antennas and ground systems for 1750 meters
Posted by Ed Gelinas on November 17, 2004 at 21:03:51
Hi Max,
Thanx much for all the 1750 Mtr info. I already printed it out. It's great!
I live in the land of 'wierd' and virtually ALL the base loaded verticals I've tried with and without top hats have been miserable failures. And I used low-loss coils and good insulation,too. Only success was using a vertical with the coil at the 'up 80%' point, just below the top hat.(see Alan's comment-I have lots of trees here) The current-carrying portion was only 17.5 ft. Am planning a new antenna with twice that length and a corresponding smaller dia(and self-supporting)hat. Am waiting on the arrival of the Litz wire (75/40) for the new coil (6900uH). Only unknown will be the ground resistance vs the additional height. If I can still get 90 mA thruout the 35 ft vertical length below the coil, it should 'cook'. Time will tell. Thanx again & 73,
Ed Gelinas KLFB & KHFB
Re: UNID NBD Query
Posted by Jim Renfrew on November 17, 2004 at 23:01:30
Thanks for the info - all appear to be correct, based on ther other stations I was hearing. I'll make note of that web site.
Re: UNID NBD Query
Posted by Jim Renfrew on November 17, 2004 at 23:23:53
HR appears to be Hierro, Canary Islands GP appears to be Lajes, Azores
Re: transmitting antennas and ground systems for 1750 meters - a
Posted by Max Carter on November 18, 2004 at 09:16:45
Thanks for your comments Alan. I see that in the decade since I drifted away from the Longwave scene, opinions still vary as to how to get the most out of a transmitting antenna/ground installation. I'm no expert. My own antenna project drew heavily on the work of Mideke, Lee, Pinto and other writers of the 1980s who appear in the 1987 booklet. Some of those guys worked to the point of burn-out in their efforts to maximize those precious radiated microwatts. I hope current experimenters can build on that work.
Max
Re: transmitting antennas and ground systems for 1750 meters
Posted by Max Carter on November 18, 2004 at 10:19:42
Ed,
For what it's worth, I think the best legal LowFER transmitting antenna ever built was Mark Mallory's MPM in Salt Lake City. The antenna, on the flat roof of the building where Mark was employed, was a grounded 35' steel tower. The transmitter and loading coil, a plexiglas and litz job with a measured Q of over 1000, were mounted at the TOP of the tower. The tower's insulated guy wires (the insulators were installed 50' out from the tower) formed the system's counterpoise. The result of this 'upside down' configuration was that maximum antenna current flowed at the top of the tower. Considerable current, in fact, flowed at the BOTTOM of the tower as well. It could be argued that the whole building radiated! MPM could be heard thoughtout the western US in the late '80s.
Max
Re: transmitting antennas and ground systems for 1750 meters
Posted by Alan G3NYK on November 18, 2004 at 19:37:05
Hi Ed you sound like a good candidate for a "Bill Ashlock" loop. If you have trees within a distance equal to the antenna height, verticals will be pretty hopeless. WD2XDW is reaching ZL on a 360 foot periphery loop on 136kHz...ok he is using a 1kW PA to drive it, but even at that power its hung in the tress. If you can look a couple of hundred feet in all direction without seeing anything above the aerial the you have a good chance with a vertical. Several of the 1W lowfers including Bill are using loops to good effect, and you dont have to mess up the "lawn"
Good luck with it Cheers de Alan G3NYK
Re: transmitting antennas and ground systems for 1750 meters
Posted by Ed Gelinas on November 18, 2004 at 20:43:11
Max & Alan,
Thanx for the info. The LW setup here is actually a 'mini' broadcasting setup that relies mostly on coverage of 1 sq mi. But I did copy the sig Q5 (wideband A-M on DX160) with just a resonated 10 ft whip and no external amplification at a distance of 10 mi with the old vertical. It actually worked pretty well(F/S @ 1.0 Mi was 142 uv/M thru lots of obstructions. At 1550 ft (a 'clear' shot), it was 1.12 mV/M. Not too bad! Weathering is what finally led to the antenna's demise. Good excuse to make the new one twice as tall(41 vs 20+ ft)It's sure gonna be fun putting it up!
73 & tnx agn,
Ed G.
wd2xgj cw 137.58
Posted by lloyd chastant on November 19, 2004 at 19:59:02
Here is a nice copy of WD2XGJ cw on my TS-870 with the 50Hz cw filter..He had sent a couple of "VV de" before he sent his call but all that won't fit on the Argo screen..That line(I assume is a Loran line sure is a big problem here on trying to get good copy...Wonder if others also see that strong line????
http://www.geocities.com/lacwman/wd2xgj.jpg
de Lloyd W3NF FM19Mh
Re: wd2xgj cw 137.58 *** Now 137.56 ***
Posted by Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ on November 19, 2004 at 20:45:09
Thanks Lloyd !
I've moved XGJ down another 10 Hz or so to hopefully get away from the Loran line. WD2XGJ now on about 137.560 +/-
I will be making some QSLs and QSL all valid reception reports (Lloyd - you certainly qualify!)
73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ
Longwave radios
Posted by Matthew Parij on November 20, 2004 at 11:38:15
Are there any manufacturers that make Longwave radios?
I'm not talking about the multiband ones that Panasonic and Sony make, I'm talking about ones that can only pick up longwave.
Re: Longwave radios
Posted by Mike E Terry on November 22, 2004 at 15:12:26
There are plenty of them in Europe but none that are solely longwave.
Re: Longwave radios
Posted by John Bogath on November 23, 2004 at 10:52:52
I am not aware of any new ones, but there are a number of older LW-only receivers (mostly tubes) on the surplus markets. One that I think is particularly nice is the Collins R389. There are several others that I think people would recommend to you.
Re: Longwave radios
Posted by Tim Brannon KF5CQ on November 23, 2004 at 23:14:04
Matthew,
I know your question may just be in general, but have you considered how you plan to use your longwave radio? Are you mainly interested in LW broadcast, or NDBs, or LowFERs or amateur radio? Does it need to be portable? What kind of antenna?
HiFER Report de IL
Posted by Peter Barick on November 24, 2004 at 15:34:48
Hi All,
Been listening to 13.555 summer & fall. Not much exciting.
Using the R-8 and a E-W extended dipole at 40 feet.
Only once see and hear MP, Oct 30, 3:15P. Also saw the saw-tooth about 25Hz above, NC(?). The saw-tooth is a regular here most afternoons. But last week no sigs to report.
Still hearing HI all over. Se GA also PMs. On Nov 03, about 4:45P, saw a double saw-tooth and strong.
New one today: saw PBJ 1:10P and v strong. Turned sens down on Argo. Chars would rise noticably on dashes. Others reporting this??
First day of snow. My LF vert ant radials still coiled. Gotta do somthing quick. Plan on switching to LF by early Dec.
Cheers, Peter
Re: LowFER UWL
Posted by Peter B. on November 24, 2004 at 15:49:10
Hi Eric,
Good. Will be looking again this season. Caught UWL once last and got your fine qsl.
The Lf wire flattop will be higher (40+ feet) and more welded galv fence wire over the 70+ radials. Also working on new top-loading coil using Teflon ins. wire, for about 1.5mH. (Yeeks, the high cost of no. 12 CU wire.)
Been using the LCR meter that OM Bill (MA) reco'd. Real nice for what-ifs.
Cheers, Peter
Re: HiFER Report de IL
Posted by Bill Ashlock on November 26, 2004 at 03:15:00
Peter,
Long time, no communicate. Is that sawtooth more like a tigertooth? Had to check, but I'm still transmitting in that area of the 13.555 watering hole.
Get going on that LF vertical!
Bill
Re: HiFER Report de IL
Posted by Eric KD5UWL on November 26, 2004 at 20:25:45
Bill Ashlock wrote:
> ... Get going on that LF vertical!
Not something you hear Bill say *every* day ...
:)
Re: HiFER Report de IL
Posted by Bill Ashlock on November 28, 2004 at 21:31:46
>> ... Get going on that LF vertical!
>Not something you hear Bill say *every* day ...
Hate to see anything that's become old and falling out of use become totally extint! Now if that isn't an opening for 100 quick replies, I don't know what is! :)
Bill
WD2XES Wolf copy
Posted by lloyd chastant on November 29, 2004 at 06:45:03
Here is my copy on WD2XES Wolf mode from last nite hr in Maryland...
C:\Wolf>wolf -q nov28.wav -r 8001.64 -f 800.059 WOLF version 0.61 Wolf copy on WD2XES 137.271 Nov 28,2004 by W3NF FM19MH t: 24 f:-0.005 a:-0.4 dp: 81.2 ci: 2 cj:144 BJI4 7J1XQM9..1 ?
t: 48 f:-0.003 a:-0.5 dp: 81.5 ci: 2 cj:144 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t: 96 f:-0.001 a:-0.8 dp: 80.7 ci: 2 cj:144 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t: 192 f: 0.000 pm: 75 jm:671 q: 3.3 2.9 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t: 288 f: 0.000 pm: 197 jm:671 q: 6.7 6.4 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t: 384 f: 0.000 pm: 308 jm:671 q: 8.2 8.3 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t: 480 f: 0.000 pm: 410 jm:671 q: 9.5 9.7 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t: 576 f: 0.000 pm: 499 jm:671 q: 10.6 10.8 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t: 672 f: 0.000 pm: 585 jm:671 q: 11.4 11.7 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t: 768 f: 0.000 pm: 644 jm:671 q: 12.4 12.5 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t: 864 f: 0.000 pm: 703 jm:671 q: 12.9 12.8 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t: 960 f: 0.000 pm: 758 jm:671 q: 13.2 13.1 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t:1056 f: 0.000 pm: 842 jm:671 q: 13.5 13.4 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t:1152 f: 0.000 pm: 927 jm:671 q: 13.8 13.8 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t:1248 f: 0.000 pm: 1012 jm:671 q: 14.3 14.1 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t:1344 f: 0.000 pm: 1067 jm:671 q: 14.5 14.3 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t:1440 f: 0.000 pm: 1107 jm:671 q: 14.7 14.6 DE WD2XES WOLF -
t:1536 f: 0.000 pm: 1163 jm:671 q: 15.0 15.0 DE WD2XES WOLF -
de Lloyd W3NF
WD2XES PSK08 copy
Posted by lloyd chastant on November 30, 2004 at 07:51:28
Here is a bit of my copy on John's PSK08 mode hr in Maryland this morning,,Interesting to compare copy with the Wolf mode..
}This is WD2XES Hnding SuecLabKs PSKØ8 on 137.271 kHz.
{10}This is WD2XES sending SpecLab's PSKØ8 > 137t 271 kHz.
{10}This is WD2XES sendang SpecLab's PSKØ8 on 137s271 kHz.
{10}This is WD2XES see-ingcpeab'
PSKØ8 on 137.271 kHz.o{10}This is WD2Xo S sending Speab"s PSKØ8 on 1G7.271 kHz.
{10}Th-o it h D2XoS sending Specenab's P KØ8 oo·3e{10}.271 c =z{10}This is WD2XES sending SnecLab's PSKa 8 on 137t 271 kHzgThis os WDB ES sending SpecLab's PSKØ8 on 137.271 kHza
{10},his is WD,ES sendin_Sn?Labs s PS¬u8 on 13dte271 kHz.o{10}Thiy{10}s WD2XES sendi g p{23}La n's PL8 on 1{9}7.2C i kHz.This is WDdXES tefi g SpecPab'yPSKhn f 7t ne71 p==.
{10}Teei1 ) WDeoXE2tend{27}g Sf cPaytns =;,Øle on 137r271 kHÆtT eit is WDÁ EersL-ing Spec¦ {10}Is :SKto8 on 1 7.271 dHz.
{10}Ahas is WD2XsS sendi g SnocLab's PSKØ8 on 1ne7.1 kHzg
{10}This isWD2XES se ding Sp cLab's PSKØ8 on 137.271 kH{10} .
{10}This is WD2X S sending SpecLabaos PSKØ8 > 137.271 kHz.
{10}This is WDdXES sending SpecLab's PSKØ8 on 137.271 kHÆs
{10}This is WD2XES sending Spec.ab's PSatL8 on 137.é1 kHz.
{10}This is WD2XES sRding SpecLab's PSKØ8 on 137.271 kHz.
{10}Thial W•XES sending SpecLab'l PSKØ8 on 137.271 kHz.
{10}This is WD2Xo S s{9}ding SpesUab's PSKØ8 on 137.271 toHz.
{10}This is WD2X oS se ding SnecLab's PSKa h on 137.27t kHzu
{10}This Õ r D l-ES senD ng?pecsab'aêKØ8 oe 13_eo2Ck kðue Th-o i1 nD ia4S Xndin e a
de Lloyd W3NF
WD2XES GBPSK
Posted by lloyd chastant on November 30, 2004 at 22:20:19
And one more of John's modes..the Africam GBPSK ..copy hr in Maryland tonite
AFRICAM log opened: Tue Nov 30 2004 at 20:08 Local Time BPSK copy on WD2XES Africam MS500 137.271 11/30/204 by W3NF
20:08:24 m" WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2
20:16:47 [10]P1[11]WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2
20:24:15 TmgWD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD
20:32:30 2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES W
20:40:46 t9"i D2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES 20:49:02 18pt9"iWD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES
20:57:18 i 8Xt9"iWD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XE
21:05:34 y"WD2XES WD2XES WD2IES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2X
21:13:49 ES[10]A PiE3iWD2 iJd>1sXES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES 21:21:41 Mb[12]t9"i 8pXES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2
21:29:33 hd1 WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD
21:37:49 Et9"i*8PXES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES W
21:46:04 p0XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES WD2XES 21:54:20 [08]hbd9"
de Lloyd W3NF
www.lwca.org
potrzebie