Past LW Messages - November 2019


Addresses and URLs contained herein may gradually become outdated.

 

Europe 1 183 khz
Posted by Mike Terry on November 01, 2019 at 09:28:14.

Ydun Ritz‎ wrote at WRTH Facebook group - World Radio Tv Handbook
1 November 2019 - 32 mins ago ·
From a Belgian dxer:
Europe 1 on LW 183 Khz, off the air at 08:00 UTC.
No reason given.

 

Reminder: Lowfer net +/- 3927Khz Saturday morning 0800 California time
Posted by Jerry Parker on November 01, 2019 at 15:37:12.

Reminder: Lowfer net +/- 3927Khz Saturday morning 0800 California time
Or listen online at kfs:
http://69.27.184.62:8901/?tune=3927lsb
or
KPH Point Reyes:
http://198.40.45.23:8073/
or
Utah Web sdr:
http://websdr1.utahsdr.org:8901/
If you cannot get into the net on 80 meters you can listen on KFS and participate by sending net control your thoughts t wa6owr@gmail.com
73,
Jerry WA6OWR

 

Re: Europe 1 183 khz
Posted by Mike Terry on November 01, 2019 at 17:37:39.
In reply to Europe 1 183 khz posted by Mike Terry on November 01, 2019

Gaétan Teyssonneau wrote on DXLD
wor@groups.io

1 November 2019


Hello,

I inform you that friday 1 november from 8:00 utc europe 1 and absent on 183 khz can not currently listen Europe 1

So I contacted Anne Fauconnier in charge of the operation of Europe 1 transmitters

Anne.Fauconnier@europe1.fr

"" We are currently testing our long wave transmitter ""

In short, the test consists of measuring the reactions of the listeners.

To see if the listener is still listening to the 183 khz in order to possibly perform a drop in power, or more simply, delete this program.

Feel free to send him an email if you listen to 183 khz for this program to be maintained ...

Good afternoon Gaétan

 

Re: Europe 1 183 khz
Posted by Mike Terry on November 01, 2019 at 17:38:52.
In reply to Europe 1 183 khz posted by Mike Terry on November 01, 2019

Christian Ghibaudo wrote on the WRTH Facebook page:

No certainly not a close down. I phoned to Europe 1 in Paris. Today it's a Bank Holiday in France, and they told me no answer until Monday....

Technical works in Felsberg transmitter site. Europe 1 hope to be back on the air soon...They ask to the listeners to listen on FM or Internet.

 

Re: Europe 1 183 khz
Posted by Mike Terry on November 02, 2019 at 08:55:33.
In reply to Re: Europe 1 183 khz posted by Mike Terry on November 01, 2019

I had this email reply from the station :

Hello
you can also listen to us on europe1.fr or on our mobile application.
Regards
Anne Fauconnier

 

Re: Europe 1 183 khz
Posted by Mike Terry on November 02, 2019 at 10:07:09.
In reply to Re: Europe 1 183 khz posted by Mike Terry on November 02, 2019

It seems that depending on the amount of protest they receive, they will decide whether to keep going, to use lower power or to close the LW service altogether.

 

Re: Lowfer net +/- 3927Khz Saturday morning
Posted by Clint Turner KA7OEI on November 02, 2019 at 20:04:03.
In reply to Reminder: Lowfer net +/- 3927Khz Saturday morning 0800 California time posted by Jerry Parker on November 01, 2019

Notes on 2 November, 2019 Lowfer net

Present were:
WA6OWR, Jerry; Dave, WD4PLI; Clint, KA7OEI; Ed, KI6R; John, AEØCQ





73,
Clint KA7OEI

 

Re: Europe 1 183 khz
Posted by Mike Terry on November 03, 2019 at 11:26:18.
In reply to Re: Europe 1 183 khz posted by Mike Terry on November 02, 2019

Christian Ghibaudo on WRTH Facebook group
November 3, 2019

This morning Bernard Poirette anchorman of the weekend morning news told that LW will be back tomorrow Monday.

 

2200m band dx
Posted by swlem3 on November 03, 2019 at 15:09:11.

Was pleasantly surprised to find VK4YB in my overnight 2200m wspr decodes.

2019-11-03 10:54 VK4YB 0.137596 -27 0 QG62ku 1 SWLEM3 EM03rf 13250 65

Antenna used: 7m length vertical. Perhaps this will be a good winter season for dx on the lower freqs.

 

Re: Europe 1 183 khz
Posted by Mike Terry on November 04, 2019 at 13:39:43.
In reply to Re: Europe 1 183 khz posted by Mike Terry on November 03, 2019

Europe 1 now back on air.

 

Kalundborg 243 kHz
Posted by Mike Terry on November 04, 2019 at 15:12:58.

Ydun Ritz reports today in the WRTH Facebook group:
Due to antenna maintenance work at DR Kalundborg 243 kHz there will be no noon transmissions (1045-1115 UTC) Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday this week.

 

Re: 630m Spots
Posted by Ed Holland on November 04, 2019 at 18:50:56.
In reply to Re: 630m Spots posted by Ed Holland on October 31, 2019

I played around with a loop antenna yesterday. This was a contraption I built a while ago, and takes the classic form of two 4' timbers crossed at the centre, wound with about 10 turns of enameled wire. An old variable capacitor tunes the coil and the range is nicely centered close to 630 m (accident?). An independent single turn provides coupling and impedance transformation for a coax connection to the receiver.

This aerial has a pretty good capture, and despite my tests being in the radio room in our basement, the natural static peaked higher on the S meter than for the long wire, IIRC. Reception tests brought in plenty of WSPR spots.

One benefit of the loop is its selectivity against broadcast band signals, which are at risk of overloading even the best among my receivers. Several locals practically peg the S meter at S9+40 or S9+50!

Anyway, it makes for fun, cheap radio tinkering.

 

Re: 2200m band dx
Posted by Roger, VK4YB on November 05, 2019 at 01:03:53.
In reply to 2200m band dx posted by swlem3 on November 03, 2019

To SWLEM3

Many thanks for your report on 2200m and the many reports on 630m. I am conducting experiments to see how my 2200m signals are reaching to Eric, NO3M in PA at a distance of almost 15000km. I had thought the signals was taking a more Northerly route, skirting the polar region, owing to the lack of reports from intervening stations. Your location is right on the Great Circle route to NO3M, so perhaps my Northern Route theory is wrong. Keep up the good work.
73 Roger, VK4YB

 

Re: 2200m band dx
Posted by swlem3 on November 05, 2019 at 10:02:30.
In reply to Re: 2200m band dx posted by Roger, VK4YB on November 05, 2019

I appreciate your reply Roger, thanks. I plan to be more active on 2200m, (shifting my focus from 630m), over this NA winter season so hopefully I can supply a few more "data points" for you. 73

 

Re: 630m Spots
Posted by Ed Holland on November 06, 2019 at 18:07:37.
In reply to Re: 630m Spots posted by Ed Holland on November 04, 2019

With WSPR now running like clockwork, I felt it was time to see what was happening with the interactive traffic. The wider track of JT9 signals are frequently apparent in the spectrum display of WSJT-x, and after synchronising clocks, The system was decoding CQ's and the occasional QSO. I left the system running (somewhat by accident) and should have a 24 hour snapshot of activity available later this evening.

Cheers

Ed

 

Re: 630m Spots
Posted by Tom on November 06, 2019 at 22:19:54.
In reply to Re: 630m Spots posted by Ed Holland on November 06, 2019

Very good Ed. I'm pretty sure you'll find the 630m activity mostly an evening endeavor, but there's bound to be exceptions. If you're in the Western US, there's a number of guys using the slower modes on JT9 that aren't included in the wsjt-x software suite. If you want to monitor that activity, go to this site and get the decoding program:

http://www.472khz.org/SlowJT9/

Unfortunately, I can't participate in decoding and uploading my decodes because the program isn't capable of being set up to report with a non-ham call. It won't accept an swl call.

 

Re: 630m Spots
Posted by Ed Holland on November 07, 2019 at 16:19:30.
In reply to Re: 630m Spots posted by Tom on November 06, 2019

Thanks Tom - You answered a question that was in the back of my head - no Ham call here either, so no reporting.

- Is it the same for WSPR?

I also had a quick tune down to 136 kHz yesterday evening and pulled in WH2XND from Arizona, despite a remarkable set of wobbly stripes no-doubt emanating from a switched PSU somewhere nearby.

This was using the Lowe HF-225 reciver, which seems very capable at LW and MW frequencies. The only thing that makes use of this radio a little more difficult compared to some of my others is that the dial readout is to the nearest kHz, so accurate tuning/freq reporting is more of a challenge. The good thing is that, with a quiet LCD readout, it generates no LF noise of its own. The Lowe range are good receivers - I'm a bit of a collector of this brand...

Ed

 

2200m WSPR
Posted by Ed Holland on November 07, 2019 at 16:52:40.

A first (successful) listen in on 2200m featured last evening (6-NOV-19 local time). I received just two WSPR beacons, in the period 0536-0600 UTC (7-NOV-19). These were N6 LF, and WH2XND.

Antenna is an 80 ft long wire, transformer coupled at the feed point. The receiver was a Lowe HF-225.

Ed

 

Re: 2200m WSPR
Posted by Tom on November 07, 2019 at 20:18:53.
In reply to 2200m WSPR posted by Ed Holland on November 07, 2019

I knew that wire would do well for you Ed, even if it could use some "optimizing" on 2200m. You may be able to copy W7IUV up in Washington the next time he fires up the tx. There's also WH2XXP, close-by to XND in AZ, but I've not seen him on for awhile. KA7OEI in Utah is also a possibility if you can catch him in the tx mode.

 

Reminder: Lowfer net +/- 3927Khz Saturday morning 0800 California time
Posted by Jerry Parker on November 08, 2019 at 18:27:33.

Reminder: Lowfer net +/- 3927Khz Saturday morning 0800 California time
Or listen online at KFS:
http://69.27.184.62:8901/?tune=3927lsb
or
KPH Point Reyes:
http://198.40.45.23:8073/
or
Utah Web sdr:
http://www.sdrutah.org/websdr1.html?tune=3927lsb
If you cannot get into the net on 80 meters you can listen on KFS and participate by sending net control your thoughts t wa6owr@gmail.com
73,
Jerry WA6OWR

 

Re: 2200m WSPR
Posted by Ed Holland on November 08, 2019 at 19:34:27.
In reply to Re: 2200m WSPR posted by Tom on November 07, 2019

Cheers Tom.

The wire is doing well, I hope this Winter i kind to it, it fell a couple of times last year due to high winds. I think the coupling transformer may be running out of steam at LF, and that may contribute to some noise getting in from the coax. Easy to test, and produce an alternative with more impedance at the frequency of interest.

Cheers,

Ed

 

Re: Lowfer net 3927Khz Saturday morning
Posted by John Davis on November 09, 2019 at 16:58:40.
In reply to Reminder: Lowfer net +/- 3927Khz Saturday morning 0800 California time posted by Jerry Parker on November 08, 2019

Clint was not with us this week to take his usual excellent notes on the net, and I was Away From Keyboard myself, but fortunately the recording worked. It's shorter than some recent sessions, so you can probably stream the whole thing just by clicking the link. However, right-click if you want to save it to your local drive anyway.

websdr_2019-11-09_3927kHz.mp3

 

Re: 2200m WSPR
Posted by John Davis on November 10, 2019 at 18:42:01.
In reply to Re: 2200m WSPR posted by Ed Holland on November 08, 2019

This thread reminded me I hadn't looked at 2200 m WSPR in some time, so I did that from about half an hour before sunset last night, well into this morning. Prior to sunset, I already had decodes of WA9GCZ, K3MF, and eventually N4WLO (the latter was visible early on, but the PLC right at 137.500 kept it from decoding for a time). Stations overall during the night, listed in reverse order of first time decoded, followed by some random observations:

Timestamp           Call       MHz     SNR   Grid      Pwr     km     az   #Spots
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019-11-10 09:20    WB5MMB   0.137550  -30   EM22nm   0.001    510    358     3 
2019-11-10 03:46    W7IUV    0.137421  -21   DN07dg   0.5     2305    110     1 
2019-11-10 03:34    N1DAY    0.137456  -24   EM85sg     5     1154    284    36 
2019-11-10 03:32    NO3M     0.137520  -10   EN91wr     1     1385    253     4 
2019-11-10 01:10    KA9OKH   0.137556  -22   EM67fx     5      675    264     8 
2019-11-10 00:58    N6LF     0.137468  -17   CN83lt     1     2463     98    31 
2019-11-09 23:46    K3RWR    0.137480  -16   FM18qi     1     1630    271   114 
2019-11-09 23:22    N4WLO    0.137501  -12   EM50uo   0.2      959    321    58 
2019-11-09 23:20    K3MF     0.137411  -14   FM19sr     1     1649    266    50 
2019-11-09 23:12    WA9CGZ   0.137433  -26   EN61ch   0.5      786    236    12

Reporter:   AE0CQ   EM27kc
Antenna is the 40 foot vertical on the farm, with buffer amp at the base. The receiver was an ICOM R-75, and software was WSPR X. Now, the random thoughts...

1. WSPRnet must be drastically overloaded these days... lots of timeouts when loading pages this morning.

2. One thing that makes WSPR a poor tool for propagation studies (at least, on bands with low usage) is that we have no way of knowing whether a station stopped showing up because the path closed, or because the operator simply shut down. That's an uncontrolled variable; in the absence of other ongoing stations from the same vicinity, we can't even draw any meaningful guesses based on statistics. Is N4WLO the only station in the country that stayed on the air past 6 AM today, or did the band really close in every other direction from here? No way to tell.

3. Some amateurs may not be using the best assumptions about radiation resistance or ground losses when performing their power calculations.

Based on prior years' observations of Part 5 experimental operations in the band, there are a couple whose signal strengths suggest better efficiency than their low reported power level. On the other hand, some that display a nominal 0.5 or 1 W don't seem to be doing quite as well as one might hope, even in the absence of QRM.

And it's totally unclear to me why anyone would want to advertise running 5 times the power authorized for 2200 meters, even if the received signals don't necessarily appear to back up the claim.

 

Re: 2200m WSPR
Posted by Tom on November 10, 2019 at 20:46:16.
In reply to Re: 2200m WSPR posted by John Davis on November 10, 2019

Looks like you've had a good overnight rx session on 2200m,John.

1. wsprnet... :-( takes sometimes forever to load, and you may have noticed that a percentage of spots supposedly uploaded don't get posted... they get "dropped".

2. I'll add... no, N4WLO is not the only station continuing to TX but, wb5mmb with limited power-out, isn't getting heard unless the right station at the right distance is "on the air" to decode him. Another factor that upsets things for a good propagation study is that 2200m reception is very dependent on the stations ability to control the local "noise-makers"... either from his own home or the surrounding neighbors. I've had local qrm at times drastically impairing my ability to get decent decodes when propagation was just fine. The db level of the decodes sent to wsprnet didn't accurately reflect the real situation of how well the signals were coming in.

3. Yes, some hams just "wing-it" with their EIRP estimations. A number of stations' figures are probably not accurate. I'm sure most are doing their best but may not have the proper "tools" or the technical knowledge to factor in all the variables. From experience, I've noted that far more "egregious" things have gone on other than a fellow advertising higher power than allowed. There's a certain fellow occasionally on 630m ... well, I just leave things there. ;-)

 

New Hifer AN2
Posted by Jeff on November 11, 2019 at 01:40:25.

Hifer beacon AN2 on the air today near Maryville, Tennessee (EM85bs). Frequency is 13563.090 Khz with a 13 wpm CW ID. AN2 is solar powered and is transmitting into a half wave dipole up 12' using a twisted pair feedline. The Beacon is assembled from a Blackcat System kit and will transmit 24/7. Reports appreciated. Jeff K8NDB

 

Re: 2200m WSPR
Posted by mike N8OOU on November 11, 2019 at 13:03:28.
In reply to Re: 2200m WSPR posted by John Davis on November 10, 2019

John,

As to knowing whether a station is on, you can look at the WSPR Database page and see if any one else is reporting the station. I have a 24/7 receiver on 2200m and just looked up my past 48 Hrs. I found N4WLO in almost every timeslot. We are about the same distance from him.

I must admit that I was surprised to see the 24Hr report, because I have seen my receptions completely stop in the daytime too, even though the noise level seemed to remain low.

As to Power calculations, I admit my understanding of all the factors is not complete. I don't have equipment to make calibrated measurements. At best all I can say is "relative to yesterday" I'm better or worse.

Another factor as to what power number to put in the WSPR message, is it depends on who/where you ask. I was told EIRP by some, Input power by others, and even by one person said, "Don't worry about the number we can figure it out!".

73 Mike

 

RTE
Posted by Mike Terry on November 12, 2019 at 12:08:50.

After it's recent lengthy maintenance shutdown, RTE R1 on LW 252 kHz is off again air today (12 Nov) but only for up to 7 hours between 1000-1700.

(radio.ie @BrianGreene on Twitter, via Alan Pennington BDXC)

 

Re: RY On for the Winter
Posted by Ed Holland on November 12, 2019 at 16:54:52.
In reply to RY On for the Winter posted by John, W1TAG on October 29, 2019

It's possible that RY was received here in CA during monitoring on 10th Nov. Certainly there was a CW trace observed at, or very close to the correct frequency. Alas, it was not readable for a positive ID - conditions never really allowed signals to lift against the noise. However, since EH has been recorded very clearly in recent weeks here at CM87, I am hopeful for RY when conditions do perk up a bit.

Cheers

Ed

 

Re: RTE
Posted by Mike Terry on November 13, 2019 at 09:53:46.
In reply to RTE posted by Mike Terry on November 12, 2019

Good to know RTE seems committed to the postponement of closure plans at least until 2021.

Bad news for dxers is that the high power Algeria transmitter knocks it out during darkness, even in the UK!

 

630 m WSPR
Posted by Ed Holland on November 13, 2019 at 21:58:49.

There was a lot of 630 m activity last night. Focusing on WSPR, I received many instances of signals in excess of 2000 km and some in excess of 3000 km here in California (SF Bay Area). Of Note were K9FD in Hawaii, WA9CGZ in Illinois, and KL7L in Alaska.

The Lowe receiver + Longwire seem a good combination.

 

Re: New Hifer AN2
Posted by Jeff K8NDB on November 14, 2019 at 13:51:17.
In reply to New Hifer AN2 posted by Jeff on November 11, 2019

I tweaked the frequency of AN2 today and it is now pounding away on 13563.500 Khz. 73's Jeff K8NDB

 

Re: Lowfer SIW again QRV
Posted by Rob - K3RWR on November 14, 2019 at 14:35:33.
In reply to Lowfer SIW again QRV posted by Garry, K3SIW on October 02, 2019

Four nice WSPR-15 decodes of K3SIW on 188185 Hz overnight 11/14/2019 at FM18qi (1113 Km)

 

Re: Lowfer SIW again QRV
Posted by Garry, K3SIW on November 14, 2019 at 16:59:50.
In reply to Re: Lowfer SIW again QRV posted by Rob - K3RWR on November 14, 2019

Thanks for the report Rob. Andy, KU4XR has been decoding both wspr-15 and opera-32 in TN, along with locals NK9M and KB9PWQ. For opera we're now using the program OP32Rx.exe, available for download at http://rn3aus.narod.ru/Op32Rx/index.html (translate Russian to English with Google). Thanks I believe to Luis, EA5DOM for pointing out that program. Jim, K8RZ portable in FL has also copied the beacon, first via QRSS30/60 then last night on opera-32. That's a path of over 1000 miles and represents state #22 where the beacon has been copied:

List of States receiving SIW lowfer beacon located at EN51uq, Oswego, IL

1. Illinois (K3SIW - EN52ta, 23.4 mi; NK9M - 0 mi; K9BAG - 29.5 mi)
2. Connecticut (W1VD - FN31ms, 794.1 mi)
3. Indiana (W9NU - EN71as, 120.8 mi)
4. Ohio (N8TL - EN80ex, 247.6 mi)
5. Tennessee (KU4XR - EM75xr, 470.7 mi, KB4OER - EM86ui, 509.1 mi)
6. Minnesota (K0MVJ - EN36wt, 401.6 mi)
7. Louisiana (W5JGV - EM31js, 735.9 mi)
8. Oklahoma (KL1X - EM26ar, 534.7 mi)
9. South Carolina (WD4NGG - EM92of, 772.3 mi)
10. Texas (Charles Wenzel, Austin - EM10cg, 964.4 mi)
11. Pennsylvania (WA3USG - FN10le, 597.3 mi), later WA3TTS - EN90xn, 437 mi
12. North Carolina (W4DEX - EM95tg, 616 mi)
13. Missouri (KC0TKS - EM38iq, 347 mi), later K0AZ - EM37cd, 430 mi
14. Colorado (KD0GS - DN70ke, 886 mi), later AB0CW - DM79ku, 891 mi
15. Oregon (AA7U - DN15ao, 1503 mi)
16. Kansas (John Davis, KD4IDY - EM27kc, 483 mi)
17. Arkansas (Paul, K5WMS - EM34ww, 529 mi)
18. Maine (John, W1TAG/1 - FN43sv, 823 mi)
19. Massachusetts (Jon, WS1K - FN41qw, 911 mi)
20. Alabama (Ben, KD5BYB - EM64pu, 479.1 mi) 11/21/14
21. Georgia (Jim, K8RZ - EM84aj, 556 mi) 02/11/15
22. Florida (Jim, K8RZ – portable, EL87vb, 1065.6 mi) 11/13/19

73, Garry, K3SIW, EN52ta, Elgin, IL

 

Re: Lowfer SIW again QRV
Posted by Rob - K3RWR on November 14, 2019 at 20:25:32.
In reply to Re: Lowfer SIW again QRV posted by Garry, K3SIW on November 14, 2019

And hopefully Maryland will be #23 with both EbNaut and WSPR-15 rx reports :-)

 

Re: Lowfer SIW again QRV
Posted by Garry, K3SIW on November 15, 2019 at 03:36:07.
In reply to Re: Lowfer SIW again QRV posted by Rob - K3RWR on November 14, 2019

Rob,

Sorry I forgot you already decoded lowfer SIW November 15 last year. I've added you to the list as state #22 and moved FL to state #23. Don't recall if you also decoded wspr-15 signals - poor documentation on my part.

73, Garry, K3SIW

 

Re: 630 m WSPR
Posted by Tom on November 15, 2019 at 16:14:03.
In reply to 630 m WSPR posted by Ed Holland on November 13, 2019

Very good Ed. Keep monitoring, you should be able to get further east as propagation permits... even to the East coast. The band will get quieter as the fall/winter season progresses. Looking to the W/SW, I'll bet you'll see VK4YB in your overnight decodes soon. He'll decode near your local sunrise, I believe.

 

Reminder: Lowfer net +/- 3927Khz Saturday morning 0800 California time
Posted by Jerry Parker on November 15, 2019 at 19:42:09.

Reminder: Lowfer net +/- 3927Khz Saturday morning 0800 California time
Or listen online at kfs:
http://69.27.184.62:8901/?tune=3927lsb
orKPH Point Reyes:
http://198.40.45.23:8073/
or
Utah Web sdr:
http://www.sdrutah.org/websdr1.htmlIf you cannot get into the net on 80 meters you can listen on KFS and participate by sending net control your thoughts t wa6owr@gmail.com73,
Jerry WA6OWR

 

Re: 630 m WSPR
Posted by Ed Holland on November 15, 2019 at 21:19:45.
In reply to Re: 630 m WSPR posted by Tom on November 15, 2019

Thanks Tom,

A trans-pacific spot would be great - your note on timing for that makes sense. Last night showed that US activity seems to be improving/increasing, but I was not willing to leave things running unattended due to concern over the weather. Noise here is measuring S1-S3 at the moment using the long wire.

/Ed

 

My Youtube video
Posted by Lee on November 15, 2019 at 21:34:28.

Please check out my new youtube video. The title is "Amateur Radio Beacon 136khz lowfer 2200 meters longwave". Only took me a year to complete.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6C1vS-4C9E

 

Re: 630 m WSPR
Posted by Tom on November 15, 2019 at 23:02:36.
In reply to Re: 630 m WSPR posted by Ed Holland on November 15, 2019

I also think 630m activity is increasing Ed. You're doing right to not leave things unattended overnight when there is any threat of T-storms. That wire can gather a lot of static charge hooked up to equipment. Your noise level of s1-s3 sounds about normal. Of course, that will ramp up with approaching storms or local electronic device qrm.

 

Re: Lowfer net 3927Khz Saturday morning
Posted by Clint Turner KA7OEI on November 16, 2019 at 19:04:12.
In reply to Reminder: Lowfer net +/- 3927Khz Saturday morning 0800 California time posted by Jerry Parker on November 15, 2019

Notes on 16 November, 2019 Lowfer net

Present were:
Jerry, WA6OWR; Ed, KI6R; Clint, KA7OEI; Dave, WD4PLI; John, AE0CQ - and a brief appearance at the end by Larry, K6VLF in Fresno, CA